Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which should you buy, the Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB or Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965? We offer a thorough comparison of the differences in functions, specifications and performance between the two

Created date: 2021-03-22 19:35:01

Xiaomi Poco F3 256GBGalaxy S9 Plus SM-G965
Xiaomi Poco F3 256GBGalaxy S9 Plus SM-G965

Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.

Xiaomi Poco F3 256GBGalaxy S9 Plus SM-G965
Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB

Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965
General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image3.0
60/100
rating-image3.3
65/100
Weightrating-image2.6
52/100
rating-image2.7
54/100
Screen sizerating-image4.6
91/100
rating-image4.5
90/100
Display qualityrating-image4.2
83/100
rating-image4.4
88/100
Battery liferating-image
- /100
rating-image3.6
72/100
Processing powerrating-image4.9
97/100
rating-image4.6
91/100
Memory capacityrating-image4.7
93/100
rating-image4.5
90/100
Storage capacityrating-image4.6
91/100
rating-image4.6
91/100
Rear camera performancerating-image4.9
97/100
rating-image3.0
59/100
Front camera performancerating-image4.1
81/100
rating-image2.9
58/100

"Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", performance comparison

"Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" has a width of 76.4mm, a length of 163.7mm, and a thickness of 7.8mm. Also, the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" has a width of 73.4mm, a length of 155.1mm, and a thickness of 8.1mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" and the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" and the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB60/10076.4mm x 163.7mm x 7.8mm
Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G96565/10073.4mm x 155.1mm x 8.1mm

"Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" is about 196.0g, and the weight of the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" is about 189.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreWeight
Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB52/100196.0g
Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G96554/100189.0g

"Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" has a 6.67inch display. Also, the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" has a 6.2inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" and the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDisplay size
Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB91/1006.67inch
Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G96590/1006.2inch

"Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" is 1080 x 2400, and pixel density is 394ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" is 1440 x 2960, and pixel density is 530ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" and the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScorePixel density
Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB83/100394ppi
Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G96588/100530ppi

"Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

ScoreBattery capacity
Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB - /100
Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G96572/1003500.0mAh

"Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm SM8250, with performance measured at 3.2GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965"'s CPU is a Qualcomm Snapdragon 845, with performance measured at 2.8GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" has higher specs compared to the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965". For that reason, the "Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" allows for more comfortable use of apps, and games that run more smoothly. That's why we recommend the "Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" over the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965".

ScoreCPU specs
Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB97/1003.2GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G96591/1002.8GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores)

"Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" is 8.0GB and the weight of the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" is 6.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" and the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRAM size
Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB93/1008.0GB
Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G96590/1006.0GB

"Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" is 256.0GB. Also the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" is 256.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, there is a negligible difference in storage capacity between the "Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965". As a result, you can save roughly the same amount of pictures, and install roughly the same amount of applications, on either phone. You are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreStorage size
Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB91/100256.0GB
Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G96591/100256.0GB

"Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" has a 48.0MP main camera. Also, "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" has a 12.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", with a roughly 36MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" is superior to the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" over the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB97/10048.0MP
Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G96559/10012.0MP

"Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" has an 20.0MP front camera and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", with a roughly 12MP difference. As a result, the "Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" is more suited than the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" over the "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB81/10020.0MP
Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G96558/1008.0MP

"Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB" and "Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965", performance comparison by specification sheet

Xiaomi Poco F3 256GBGalaxy S9 Plus SM-G965
ImageXiaomi Poco F3 256GBGalaxy S9 Plus SM-G965
MakerXiaomiSamsung
Release date2021-03-272018-03-16
ColorArctic White/Night Black/Deep Ocean BlueBlack
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)76.4mm x 163.7mm x 7.8mm73.4mm x 155.1mm x 8.1mm
Weight196.0g189.0g
Display size6.67inch6.2inch
Display typeAMOLEDInfinity Display Super AMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 24001440 x 2960
Pixel density394ppi530ppi
ChipsetQualcomm SM8250Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
CPU specs3.2GHz+2.42GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)2.8GHz+1.7GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size8.0GB6.0GB
Storage size256.0GB256.0GB
Rear-camera resolution48.0MP12.0MP
Front-camera resolution20.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Check price

Articles related to Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB
Articles related to Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965

Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB

Articles related to Xiaomi Poco F3 256GB
Articles related to Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965

Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Galaxy S9 Plus SM-G965

New articles