Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB vs AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:35:08, Updated date: 2021-10-20 22:44:57
Are you having trouble comparing the differences in features and performance of the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", or unsure about their differences in ease-of-use, and wondering which to buy? We did a deep-dive comparison of the features, specs, and capabilities of these two smartphone, and provided our rating of which one was a better buy.
Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB | AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB | |||
General rating: | 52.3/100 (The 545th of all smartphones) | 58.9/100 (The 351th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 65/100 | 62/100 | ||
Weight | 60/100 | 68/100 | ||
Screen size | 78/100 | 80/100 | ||
Display quality | 56/100 | 85/100 | ||
Battery life | 80/100 | 69/100 | ||
Processing power | 61/100 | 55/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 60/100 | 50/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 55/100 | 55/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 61/100 | 61/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 50/100 | 16/100 | ||
Contents
- 1."Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", performance comparison
"Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" has a width of 73.2mm, a length of 149.0mm, and a thickness of 8.2mm. Also, the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" has a width of 74.0mm, a length of 140.0mm, and a thickness of 9.3mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB | 65/100 | 73.2mm x 149.0mm x 8.2mm |
AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB | 62/100 | 74.0mm x 140.0mm x 9.3mm |
"Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" is about 174.0g, and the weight of the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" is about 154.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" is a lighter smart phone than the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB", with a difference of about 20g. For that reason the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" is a smart phone that is less likely than the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB"to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" over the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB | 60/100 | 174.0g |
AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB | 68/100 | 154.0g |
"Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" has a 5.3inch display. Also, the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" has a 5.4inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB | 78/100 | 5.3inch |
AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB | 80/100 | 5.4inch |
"Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 277ppi. Also, the resolution on the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 407ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB", with a difference of roughly 130ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" is superior to the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" over the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB | 56/100 | 277ppi |
AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB | 85/100 | 407ppi |
"Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" is 4000.0mAh, and the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" is 3300.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" has greater battery capacity than the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", with a 700mAh difference. Since the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" over the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB | 80/100 | 4000.0mAh |
AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB | 69/100 | 3300.0mAh |
"Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6750, with performance measured at 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB"'s CPU is a MSM8974AB, with performance measured at 2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" has higher specs compared to the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB". For that reason, the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" allows for more comfortable use of apps, and games that run more smoothly. That's why we recommend the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" over the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB | 61/100 | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB | 55/100 | 2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
"Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" is 3.0GB and the weight of the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" is 2.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", with a difference of about 1GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" is superior to the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" over the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB | 60/100 | 3.0GB |
AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB | 50/100 | 2.0GB |
"Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" is 32.0GB. Also the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, there is a negligible difference in storage capacity between the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB". As a result, you can save roughly the same amount of pictures, and install roughly the same amount of applications, on either phone. You are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
"Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" has a 13.1MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB | 61/100 | 13.1MP |
"Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" has an 5.0MP front camera and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" has an 2.1MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", with a roughly 2.9MP difference. As a result, the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" is more suited than the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" over the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB | 16/100 | 2.1MP |
"Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Allview P9 Energy Lite 32GB | AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Allview | |
Release date | 2016-09 | 2014-05-23 |
Color | Gold/Mocha Gold | Orange/Black/White |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 73.2mm x 149.0mm x 8.2mm | 74.0mm x 140.0mm x 9.3mm |
Weight | 174.0g | 154.0g |
Display size | 5.3inch | 5.4inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IGZO |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 277ppi | 407ppi |
Battery capacity | 4000.0mAh | 3300.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6750 | MSM8974AB |
CPU specs | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.1MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 2.1MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |