Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which should you buy, the Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB or Micromax In 1b 64GB? We offer a thorough comparison of the differences in functions, specifications and performance between the two

Created date: 2021-07-01 17:38:41

Energizer U680S (2021) 32GBMicromax In 1b 64GB
Energizer U680S (2021) 32GBMicromax In 1b 64GB

How did the evaluations between the "Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB" and "Micromax In 1b 64GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!

Energizer U680S (2021) 32GBMicromax In 1b 64GB
Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB

Micromax In 1b 64GB

General rating:

54.5/100

(The 4936th of all smartphones)

61.8/100

(The 4810th of all smartphones)

Holding comfort
- /100
- /100
Weight
- /100
- /100
Screen size
91/100
90/100
Display quality
52/100
54/100
Battery life
- /100
- /100
Processing power
55/100
88/100
Memory capacity
50/100
70/100
Storage capacity
55/100
67/100
Rear camera performance
61/100
61/100
Front camera performance
50/100
58/100

"Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB" and "Micromax In 1b 64GB", performance comparison

"Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB" and "Micromax In 1b 64GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB - /100
Micromax In 1b 64GB - /100

"Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB" and "Micromax In 1b 64GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

ScoreWeight
Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB - /100
Micromax In 1b 64GB - /100

"Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB" and "Micromax In 1b 64GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB" has a 6.8inch display. Also, the "Micromax In 1b 64GB" has a 6.52inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB" and the "Micromax In 1b 64GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDisplay size
Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB91/1006.8inch
Micromax In 1b 64GB90/1006.52inch

"Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB" and "Micromax In 1b 64GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB" is 720 x 1640, and pixel density is 263ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Micromax In 1b 64GB" is 720 x 1600, and pixel density is 269ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB" and the "Micromax In 1b 64GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScorePixel density
Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB52/100263ppi
Micromax In 1b 64GB54/100269ppi

"Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB" and "Micromax In 1b 64GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

ScoreBattery capacity
Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB - /100
Micromax In 1b 64GB - /100

"Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB" and "Micromax In 1b 64GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB"'s CPU is a Unisoc SC9863A, with performance measured at 1.6GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Micromax In 1b 64GB"'s CPU is a MediaTek Helio G35, with performance measured at 2.3GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Micromax In 1b 64GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Micromax In 1b 64GB" is superior to the "Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Micromax In 1b 64GB" over the "Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB".

ScoreCPU specs
Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB55/1001.6GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Micromax In 1b 64GB88/1002.3GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)

"Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB" and "Micromax In 1b 64GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB" is 2.0GB and the weight of the "Micromax In 1b 64GB" is 4.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Micromax In 1b 64GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB", with a difference of about 2GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Micromax In 1b 64GB" is superior to the "Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Micromax In 1b 64GB" over the "Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB".

ScoreRAM size
Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB50/1002.0GB
Micromax In 1b 64GB70/1004.0GB

"Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB" and "Micromax In 1b 64GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB" is 32.0GB. Also the "Micromax In 1b 64GB" is 64.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Micromax In 1b 64GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB", with a roughly 32GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Micromax In 1b 64GB" is superior to the "Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Micromax In 1b 64GB" over the "Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB".

ScoreStorage size
Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB55/10032.0GB
Micromax In 1b 64GB67/10064.0GB

"Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB" and "Micromax In 1b 64GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "Micromax In 1b 64GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB" and "Micromax In 1b 64GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB61/10013.0MP
Micromax In 1b 64GB61/10013.0MP

"Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB" and "Micromax In 1b 64GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB" has an 5.0MP front camera and "Micromax In 1b 64GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Micromax In 1b 64GB" has a higher pixel count than the "Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "Micromax In 1b 64GB" is better able to take high quality selfies than the "Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "Micromax In 1b 64GB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB50/1005.0MP
Micromax In 1b 64GB58/1008.0MP

"Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB" and "Micromax In 1b 64GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

Energizer U680S (2021) 32GBMicromax In 1b 64GB
ImageEnergizer U680S (2021) 32GBMicromax In 1b 64GB
MakerEnergizerMicromax
Release date2021-06-292020-11-26
ColorGreen/BlackBlue/Purple/Green
OSAndroidAndroid
Display size6.8inch6.52inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1640720 x 1600
Pixel density263ppi269ppi
ChipsetUnisoc SC9863AMediaTek Helio G35
CPU specs1.6GHz+1.2GHz×8(8.0-cores)2.3GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB4.0GB
Storage size32.0GB64.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB
Articles related to Micromax In 1b 64GB

Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB

Articles related to Energizer U680S (2021) 32GB
Articles related to Micromax In 1b 64GB

Micromax In 1b 64GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Micromax In 1b 64GB

New articles