Compare BQ Aquaris U 16GB vs BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:29:46, Updated date: 2021-10-20 18:37:52
How did the evaluations between the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!
BQ Aquaris U 16GB | BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB | |||
General rating: | 54.3/100 (The 495th of all smartphones) | 54.8/100 (The 483th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 68/100 | 61/100 | ||
Weight | 74/100 | 73/100 | ||
Screen size | 74/100 | 77/100 | ||
Display quality | 59/100 | 85/100 | ||
Battery life | 66/100 | 57/100 | ||
Processing power | 60/100 | 53/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 50/100 | 50/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 50/100 | 50/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 61/100 | 61/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 50/100 | 58/100 | ||
Contents
- 1."BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", performance comparison
"BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has a width of 71.5mm, a length of 145.0mm, and a thickness of 8.3mm. Also, the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" has a width of 74.5mm, a length of 147.0mm, and a thickness of 9.3mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". For that reason, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". For that reason, we recommend the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
BQ Aquaris U 16GB | 68/100 | 71.5mm x 145.0mm x 8.3mm |
BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB | 61/100 | 74.5mm x 147.0mm x 9.3mm |
"BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is about 140.0g, and the weight of the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" is about 142.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
BQ Aquaris U 16GB | 74/100 | 140.0g |
BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB | 73/100 | 142.0g |
"BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has a 5.0inch display. Also, the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" has a 5.2inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
BQ Aquaris U 16GB | 74/100 | 5.0inch |
BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB | 77/100 | 5.2inch |
"BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is 720 x 1280, and pixel density is 293ppi. Also, the resolution on the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 423ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" has much higher pixel density than the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", with a difference of roughly 130ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" is superior to the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" over the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
BQ Aquaris U 16GB | 59/100 | 293ppi |
BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB | 85/100 | 423ppi |
"BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
The "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is 3080.0mAh, and the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" is 2500.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has greater battery capacity than the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", with a 580mAh difference. If battery is a priority, then the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is recommended over the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB".
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
BQ Aquaris U 16GB | 66/100 | 3080.0mAh |
BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB | 57/100 | 2500.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "BQ Aquaris U 16GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8937 Snapdragon 430, with performance measured at 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615, with performance measured at 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has higher specs compared to the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". For that reason, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" allows for more comfortable use of apps, and games that run more smoothly. That's why we recommend the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" over the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
BQ Aquaris U 16GB | 60/100 | 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB | 53/100 | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is 2.0GB and the weight of the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" is 2.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
BQ Aquaris U 16GB | 50/100 | 2.0GB |
BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB | 50/100 | 2.0GB |
"BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" is 16.0GB. Also the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" is 16.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, there is a negligible difference in storage capacity between the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB". As a result, you can save roughly the same amount of pictures, and install roughly the same amount of applications, on either phone. You are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
BQ Aquaris U 16GB | 50/100 | 16.0GB |
BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB | 50/100 | 16.0GB |
"BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
BQ Aquaris U 16GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB | 61/100 | 13.0MP |
"BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"BQ Aquaris U 16GB" has an 5.0MP front camera and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" has a higher pixel count than the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB" is better able to take high quality selfies than the "BQ Aquaris U 16GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
BQ Aquaris U 16GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
"BQ Aquaris U 16GB" and "BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
BQ Aquaris U 16GB | BenQ F52 (2015) 16GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | BQ | BenQ |
Release date | 2016-09 | 2015-05 |
Color | Black | Glam Pink/Chic Gray |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 71.5mm x 145.0mm x 8.3mm | 74.5mm x 147.0mm x 9.3mm |
Weight | 140.0g | 142.0g |
Display size | 5.0inch | 5.2inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 293ppi | 423ppi |
Battery capacity | 3080.0mAh | 2500.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8937 Snapdragon 430 | Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615 |
CPU specs | 1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |