Galaxy A13 5G 64GB vs Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB: Specs & Scores
Created date: 2022-01-18 15:31:54
Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.
Galaxy A13 5G 64GB | Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | |||
General rating: | 66.9/100 (The 4699th of all smartphones) | 73.2/100 (The 1023th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 58/100 | 73/100 | ||
Weight | 52/100 | 65/100 | ||
Screen size | 90/100 | 86/100 | ||
Display quality | 54/100 | 89/100 | ||
Battery life | - /100 | 65/100 | ||
Processing power | 88/100 | 89/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 70/100 | 70/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 67/100 | 91/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 98/100 | 59/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 50/100 | 58/100 | ||
Contents
- 1."Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB", performance comparison
"Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" has a width of 76.5mm, a length of 164.5mm, and a thickness of 8.8mm. Also, the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" has a width of 68.7mm, a length of 147.7mm, and a thickness of 8.5mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB". The "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" excels over the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" over the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" is a more compact size than the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB". For that reason the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" has higher one-handed operability, and has greater portability, being less likely to get in the way when being carried. For these reasons, we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB".
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" is a considerably larger size than the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" is superior to the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" over the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB".
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A13 5G 64GB | 58/100 | 76.5mm x 164.5mm x 8.8mm |
Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | 73/100 | 68.7mm x 147.7mm x 8.5mm |
"Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" is about 195.0g, and the weight of the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" is about 163.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB", and there is a difference of about 32g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" is superior to the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" over the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A13 5G 64GB | 52/100 | 195.0g |
Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | 65/100 | 163.0g |
"Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" has a 6.5inch display. Also, the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" has a 5.8inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A13 5G 64GB | 90/100 | 6.5inch |
Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | 86/100 | 5.8inch |
"Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" is 720 x 1600, and pixel density is 269ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" is 1440 x 2960, and pixel density is 567ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB", with a difference of roughly 298ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" is superior to the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" over the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A13 5G 64GB | 54/100 | 269ppi |
Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | 89/100 | 567ppi |
"Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A13 5G 64GB | - /100 | |
Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | 65/100 | 3000.0mAh |
Want to read it together
"Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB"'s CPU is a MediaTek MT6833 Dimensity 700 5G, with performance measured at 2.2GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB"'s CPU is a Exynos 9810, with performance measured at 2.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, there is almost no difference in the specs of the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB". For that reason the level of smoothness felt when using apps and comfortable handling of games is about the same. For that reason it is better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A13 5G 64GB | 88/100 | 2.2GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | 89/100 | 2.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" is 4.0GB and the weight of the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" is 4.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A13 5G 64GB | 70/100 | 4.0GB |
Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | 70/100 | 4.0GB |
"Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" is 64.0GB. Also the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" is 256.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB", with a roughly 192GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" is superior to the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" over the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A13 5G 64GB | 67/100 | 64.0GB |
Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | 91/100 | 256.0GB |
"Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" has a 50.0MP main camera. Also, "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" has a 12.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB", with a roughly 38MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" is superior to the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" over the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A13 5G 64GB | 98/100 | 50.0MP |
Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | 59/100 | 12.0MP |
"Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" has an 5.0MP front camera and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" has a higher pixel count than the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" is better able to take high quality selfies than the "Galaxy A13 5G 64GB", and the pictures will look cleaner when printed. Therefore, we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB".
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Galaxy A13 5G 64GB | 50/100 | 5.0MP |
Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
"Galaxy A13 5G 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Galaxy A13 5G 64GB | Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Samsung | Samsung |
Release date | 2021-12-03 | 2018-03 |
Color | Black | Midnight Black/Coral Blue/Titanium Gray/Lilac Purple/Burgundy Red/Sunrise Gold/Ice Blue |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 76.5mm x 164.5mm x 8.8mm | 68.7mm x 147.7mm x 8.5mm |
Weight | 195.0g | 163.0g |
Display size | 6.5inch | 5.8inch |
Display type | PLS TFT | Super AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1600 | 1440 x 2960 |
Pixel density | 269ppi | 567ppi |
Chipset | MediaTek MT6833 Dimensity 700 5G | Exynos 9810 |
CPU specs | 2.2GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 256.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 50.0MP | 12.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |