Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Should you buy Energizer Energy 400 4GB or Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB? Compare the differences in functions and specifications/performances thoroughly

Created date: 2018-09-30 21:19:41, Updated date: 2021-10-20 18:14:46

Energizer Energy 400 4GBPocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB
Energizer Energy 400 4GBPocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB

Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" and "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" and "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.

Energizer Energy 400 4GBPocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB
Energizer Energy 400 4GB

Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB

General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image2.5
73.6mm x 134.5mm x 18.8mm
rating-image4.5
54.8mm x 104.0mm x 13.5mm
Weightrating-image1.3
367.0g
rating-image4.4
105.0g
Screen sizerating-image2.9
4.0inch
rating-image1
2.8inch
Display qualityrating-image2.1
233ppi
rating-image1
142ppi
Battery liferating-image2.8
2400.0mAh
rating-image1.3
1200.0mAh
Processing powerrating-image1
1.3GHz×2(2.0-cores)
rating-image1
0.5GHz×1(1.0-cores)
Memory capacityrating-image1
512.0MB
rating-image1
307.2MB
Storage capacityrating-image1
4.0GB
rating-image1
512.0MB
Rear camera performancerating-image2.5
8.0MP
rating-image1
3.2MP
Front camera performancerating-image1.4
3.0MP
rating-image1
0.0MP

"Energizer Energy 400 4GB" and "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB", performance comparison

"Energizer Energy 400 4GB" and "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" has a width of 73.6mm, a length of 134.5mm, and a thickness of 18.8mm. Also, the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB" has a width of 54.8mm, a length of 104.0mm, and a thickness of 13.5mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB". The "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB" excels over the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB" over the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB". The "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB" excels over the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB" over the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB".

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB" is a considerably larger size than the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB" is superior to the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB" over the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Energizer Energy 400 4GB49/10073.6mm x 134.5mm x 18.8mm
Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB89/10054.8mm x 104.0mm x 13.5mm

"Energizer Energy 400 4GB" and "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" is about 367.0g, and the weight of the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB" is about 105.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB", and there is a difference of about 262g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB" is superior to the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB" over the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB".

ScoreWeight
Energizer Energy 400 4GB25/100367.0g
Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB88/100105.0g

"Energizer Energy 400 4GB" and "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" has a 4.0inch display. Also, the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB" has a 2.8inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB", with a difference of approximately 1.2inch. The "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" is superior to the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" over the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB".

ScoreDisplay size
Energizer Energy 400 4GB58/1004.0inch
Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB15/1002.8inch

"Energizer Energy 400 4GB" and "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" is 480 x 800, and pixel density is 233ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB" is 240 x 320, and pixel density is 142ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB", with a difference of roughly 91ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" is superior to the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" over the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB".

ScorePixel density
Energizer Energy 400 4GB42/100233ppi
Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB1/100142ppi

"Energizer Energy 400 4GB" and "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" is 2400.0mAh, and the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB" is 1200.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB", with a 1200mAh difference. Since the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" over the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB".

ScoreBattery capacity
Energizer Energy 400 4GB56/1002400.0mAh
Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB26/1001200.0mAh

"Energizer Energy 400 4GB" and "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "Energizer Energy 400 4GB"'s CPU is a Mediatek MT6572, with performance measured at 1.3GHz×2(2.0-cores). Also, the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB"'s CPU is a Snapdragon S1 MSM7225, with performance measured at 0.5GHz×1(1.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" has higher specs compared to the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB". For that reason, the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" allows for more comfortable use of apps, and games that run more smoothly. That's why we recommend the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" over the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB".

ScoreCPU specs
Energizer Energy 400 4GB6/1001.3GHz×2(2.0-cores)
Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB0/1000.5GHz×1(1.0-cores)

"Energizer Energy 400 4GB" and "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" is 512.0MB and the weight of the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB" is 307.2MB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" and the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRAM size
Energizer Energy 400 4GB5/100512.0MB
Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB0/100307.2MB

"Energizer Energy 400 4GB" and "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" is 4.0GB. Also the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB" is 512.0MB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB", with a roughly 508GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" is superior to the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" over the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB".

ScoreStorage size
Energizer Energy 400 4GB11/1004.0GB
Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB0/100512.0MB

"Energizer Energy 400 4GB" and "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Energizer Energy 400 4GB" has a 8.0MP main camera. Also, "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB" has a 3.2MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB", with a roughly 4.8MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" is superior to the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" over the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Energizer Energy 400 4GB50/1008.0MP
Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB14/1003.2MP

"Energizer Energy 400 4GB" and "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Energizer Energy 400 4GB" has an 3.0MP front camera and "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB" has an 0.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB", with a roughly 3MP difference. As a result, the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" is more suited than the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "Energizer Energy 400 4GB" over the "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Energizer Energy 400 4GB27/1003.0MP
Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB0/1000.0MP

"Energizer Energy 400 4GB" and "Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB", performance comparison by specification sheet

Energizer Energy 400 4GBPocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB
ImageEnergizer Energy 400 4GBPocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB
MakerEnergizerHUAWEI
Release date2015-062011-01-14
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)73.6mm x 134.5mm x 18.8mm54.8mm x 104.0mm x 13.5mm
Weight367.0g105.0g
Display size4.0inch2.8inch
Display typeIPS LCDTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)480 x 800240 x 320
Pixel density233ppi142ppi
Battery capacity2400.0mAh1200.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6572Snapdragon S1 MSM7225
CPU specs1.3GHz×2(2.0-cores)0.5GHz×1(1.0-cores)
RAM size512.0MB307.2MB
Storage size4.0GB512.0MB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP3.2MP
Front-camera resolution3.0MP0.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to Energizer Energy 400 4GB
Articles related to Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB

Energizer Energy 400 4GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Energizer Energy 400 4GB

Articles related to Energizer Energy 400 4GB
Articles related to Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB

Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Pocket WiFi S S31HW 512MB

New articles