Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB vs Covia FLEAZ F4: Specs & Scores

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:35:04, Updated date: 2021-10-20 22:38:31

Coolpad Max (2016) 64GBCovia FLEAZ F4
Coolpad Max (2016) 64GBCovia FLEAZ F4

Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" and "Covia FLEAZ F4". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" and "Covia FLEAZ F4" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.

Coolpad Max (2016) 64GBCovia FLEAZ F4
Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB

Covia FLEAZ F4
General rating:
Holding comfortrating-image3.1
62/100
rating-image3.8
75/100
Weightrating-image3.1
62/100
rating-image3.7
74/100
Screen sizerating-image4.1
82/100
rating-image3.3
66/100
Display qualityrating-image4.3
85/100
rating-image2.4
47/100
Battery liferating-image3.1
62/100
rating-image2.2
44/100
Processing powerrating-image3.4
67/100
rating-image1
14/100
Memory capacityrating-image3.5
70/100
rating-image1.0
20/100
Storage capacityrating-image3.4
67/100
rating-image1.2
24/100
Rear camera performancerating-image3.1
61/100
rating-image1.4
27/100
Front camera performancerating-image2.5
50/100
rating-image1
0/100

"Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" and "Covia FLEAZ F4", performance comparison

"Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" and "Covia FLEAZ F4" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" has a width of 75.7mm, a length of 152.0mm, and a thickness of 7.6mm. Also, the "Covia FLEAZ F4" has a width of 66.0mm, a length of 131.0mm, and a thickness of 9.9mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Covia FLEAZ F4" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB". The "Covia FLEAZ F4" excels over the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Covia FLEAZ F4" over the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB".

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "Covia FLEAZ F4" is considerably smaller and more compact than the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB". The "Covia FLEAZ F4" excels over the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" in terms of being easier to hold with one hand and is therefore less likely to be accidentally dropped. If you're looking for a smart phone with superior grip and hand fit, we recommend purchasing the "Covia FLEAZ F4" over the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB".

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, the "Covia FLEAZ F4" is a considerably larger size than the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB". In terms of being more convenient to use one-handed, and less likely to get in the way when you're not using it, the "Covia FLEAZ F4" is superior to the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB". If you're going for the smart phone sized to be easiest to carry and handle with one hand, we recommend buying the "Covia FLEAZ F4" over the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB".

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB62/10075.7mm x 152.0mm x 7.6mm
Covia FLEAZ F475/10066.0mm x 131.0mm x 9.9mm

"Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" and "Covia FLEAZ F4", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" is about 170.0g, and the weight of the "Covia FLEAZ F4" is about 140.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "Covia FLEAZ F4" is a considerably lighter smart phone than the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB", and there is a difference of about 30g. In terms of the burden placed upon your fingers and wrist, the "Covia FLEAZ F4" is superior to the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB". If you are going for a smart phone that won't lead to hand fatigue even after extended use, and is less likely to place a burden on your fingers, we recommend purchasing the "Covia FLEAZ F4" over the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB".

ScoreWeight
Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB62/100170.0g
Covia FLEAZ F474/100140.0g

"Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" and "Covia FLEAZ F4", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" has a 5.5inch display. Also, the "Covia FLEAZ F4" has a 4.5inch display. Comparing the screen size, the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" has a considerably larger screen than the "Covia FLEAZ F4", with a difference of approximately 1inch. The "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" is superior to the "Covia FLEAZ F4" in terms of its larger buttons and the intensity of the user's experience when playing games and watching videos. In addition, the larger screen on the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" has the benefit of being easier on the user's eyes. If you are looking for a smartphone that you are less likely to mistap, offers a more intense viewing and gaming experience, and decreases eyestrain, then we recommend the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" over the "Covia FLEAZ F4".

ScoreDisplay size
Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB82/1005.5inch
Covia FLEAZ F466/1004.5inch

"Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" and "Covia FLEAZ F4", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 400ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Covia FLEAZ F4" is 540 x 960, and pixel density is 244ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" has much higher pixel density than the "Covia FLEAZ F4", with a difference of roughly 156ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" is superior to the "Covia FLEAZ F4". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" over the "Covia FLEAZ F4".

ScorePixel density
Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB85/100400ppi
Covia FLEAZ F447/100244ppi

"Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" and "Covia FLEAZ F4", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

The "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" is 2800.0mAh, and the "Covia FLEAZ F4" is 1800.0mAh. Regarding battery capacity, the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" has greater battery capacity than the "Covia FLEAZ F4", with a 1000mAh difference. Since the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" can be used for longer periods without recharging than the "Covia FLEAZ F4", it is great for outdoor use. If you want a smartphone with a longer battery life, we recommend the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" over the "Covia FLEAZ F4".

ScoreBattery capacity
Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB62/1002800.0mAh
Covia FLEAZ F444/1001800.0mAh

"Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" and "Covia FLEAZ F4", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8952 Snapdragon 617, with performance measured at 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Covia FLEAZ F4"'s CPU is a Broadcom BCM23550, with performance measured at 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Covia FLEAZ F4". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" is superior to the "Covia FLEAZ F4". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" over the "Covia FLEAZ F4".

ScoreCPU specs
Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB67/1001.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Covia FLEAZ F414/1001.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)

"Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" and "Covia FLEAZ F4", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" is 4.0GB and the weight of the "Covia FLEAZ F4" is 1.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Covia FLEAZ F4", with a difference of about 3GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" is superior to the "Covia FLEAZ F4". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" over the "Covia FLEAZ F4".

ScoreRAM size
Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB70/1004.0GB
Covia FLEAZ F420/1001.0GB

"Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" and "Covia FLEAZ F4", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" is 64.0GB. Also the "Covia FLEAZ F4" is 8.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Covia FLEAZ F4", with a roughly 56GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" is superior to the "Covia FLEAZ F4". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" over the "Covia FLEAZ F4".

ScoreStorage size
Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB67/10064.0GB
Covia FLEAZ F424/1008.0GB

"Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" and "Covia FLEAZ F4" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" has a 13.0MP main camera. Also, "Covia FLEAZ F4" has a 5.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Covia FLEAZ F4", with a roughly 8MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" is superior to the "Covia FLEAZ F4". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" over the "Covia FLEAZ F4".

ScoreRear-camera resolution
Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB61/10013.0MP
Covia FLEAZ F427/1005.0MP

"Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" and "Covia FLEAZ F4", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" has an 5.0MP front camera and "Covia FLEAZ F4" has an 0.3MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the front camera of the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Covia FLEAZ F4", with a roughly 4.7MP difference. As a result, the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" is more suited than the "Covia FLEAZ F4" for shooting videos and taking pictures. If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting high resolution selfies which will look clean when printed, we recommend the "Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" over the "Covia FLEAZ F4".

ScoreFront-camera resolution
Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB50/1005.0MP
Covia FLEAZ F40/1000.3MP

"Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB" and "Covia FLEAZ F4", performance comparison by specification sheet

Coolpad Max (2016) 64GBCovia FLEAZ F4
ImageCoolpad Max (2016) 64GBCovia FLEAZ F4
MakerCoolpadCovia
Release date2016-062015-02-20
ColorRoyal Gold/Rose GoldBlack
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)75.7mm x 152.0mm x 7.6mm66.0mm x 131.0mm x 9.9mm
Weight170.0g140.0g
Display size5.5inch4.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 1920540 x 960
Pixel density400ppi244ppi
Battery capacity2800.0mAh1800.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8952 Snapdragon 617Broadcom BCM23550
CPU specs1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size4.0GB1.0GB
Storage size64.0GB8.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP5.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP0.3MP

Check price

Articles related to Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB
Articles related to Covia FLEAZ F4

Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB

Articles related to Coolpad Max (2016) 64GB
Articles related to Covia FLEAZ F4

Covia FLEAZ F4

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Covia FLEAZ F4

New articles