Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB vs. Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB Specs & Scores
Created date: 2022-07-19 15:07:21
Here's our thorough comparison of the difference in performance and function between the "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". Which one should you buy? We'll compare and explain what differs between the "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" in a way that even people who aren't used to choosing between two similar products can understand.
Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |||
General rating: | 71.1/100 (The 4612th of all smartphones) | 63.2/100 (The 1195th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 56/100 | 52/100 | ||
Weight | 48/100 | 48/100 | ||
Screen size | 91/100 | 90/100 | ||
Display quality | 84/100 | 77/100 | ||
Battery life | - /100 | 83/100 | ||
Processing power | 85/100 | 75/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 70/100 | 70/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 90/100 | 55/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 98/100 | 68/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 58/100 | 58/100 | ||
Contents
- 1."Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", performance comparison
"Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" has a width of 76.9mm, a length of 165.4mm, and a thickness of 9.3mm. Also, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a width of 80.9mm, a length of 161.7mm, and a thickness of 7.9mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB | 56/100 | 76.9mm x 165.4mm x 9.3mm |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 52/100 | 80.9mm x 161.7mm x 7.9mm |
"Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" is about 207.0g, and the weight of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is about 210.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB | 48/100 | 207.0g |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 48/100 | 210.0g |
"Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" has a 6.6inch display. Also, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a 6.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB | 91/100 | 6.6inch |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 90/100 | 6.0inch |
"Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" is 1080 x 2408, and pixel density is 399ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 367ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" has a higher pixel density than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", with a difference of roughly 32ppi. As a result, images and videos on the "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" have better picture quality than on the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", and the former is also easier on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB | 84/100 | 399ppi |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 77/100 | 367ppi |
"Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB | - /100 | |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 83/100 | 5000.0mAh |
"Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB"'s CPU is a Exynos 850, with performance measured at 2.0GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652, with performance measured at 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" has higher specs compared to the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". For that reason, the "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" allows for more comfortable use of apps, and games that run more smoothly. That's why we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" over the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB | 85/100 | 2.0GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 75/100 | 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" is 4.0GB and the weight of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is 4.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, there is almost no difference in the amount of RAM of the "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". For that reason they have about the same level of multitasking performance and 3D game and VR smoothness. That's why it is better to make a comparison in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB | 70/100 | 4.0GB |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 70/100 | 4.0GB |
"Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" is 128.0GB. Also the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", with a roughly 96GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" is superior to the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" over the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB | 90/100 | 128.0GB |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
"Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" has a 50.0MP main camera. Also, "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a 16.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", with a roughly 34MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" is superior to the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" over the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB | 98/100 | 50.0MP |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 68/100 | 16.0MP |
"Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
"Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
Samsung Galaxy F13 128GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | Samsung | Samsung |
Release date | 2022-06-29 | 2016-05 |
Color | Waterfall Blue/Sunrise Copper/Nightsky Green | White/Black/Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 76.9mm x 165.4mm x 9.3mm | 80.9mm x 161.7mm x 7.9mm |
Weight | 207.0g | 210.0g |
Display size | 6.6inch | 6.0inch |
Display type | PLS LCD | Super AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2408 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 399ppi | 367ppi |
Chipset | Exynos 850 | Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 |
CPU specs | 2.0GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 128.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 50.0MP | 16.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |