Which is better, vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB or Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB? We compared their features and specs in detail
Created date: 2022-10-18 17:18:17
How did the evaluations between the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!
vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |||
General rating: | 67.1/100 (The 5650th of all smartphones) | 63.2/100 (The 1195th of all smartphones) | ||
Holding comfort | 59/100 | 52/100 | ||
Weight | 54/100 | 48/100 | ||
Screen size | 90/100 | 90/100 | ||
Display quality | 54/100 | 77/100 | ||
Battery life | - /100 | 83/100 | ||
Processing power | 89/100 | 75/100 | ||
Memory capacity | 90/100 | 70/100 | ||
Storage capacity | 90/100 | 55/100 | ||
Rear camera performance | 98/100 | 68/100 | ||
Front camera performance | 58/100 | 58/100 | ||
Contents
- 1."vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", performance comparison
- 1-0."vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
- 1-2."vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
- 1-3."vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
- 1-4."vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
- 1-5."vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", which has a clearer display?
- 1-6."vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", whose display is easier to use?
- 1-7."vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", which has more data storage?
- 1-8."vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
- 1-9."vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", which has better CPU?
- 1-10."vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
- 2."vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
"vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", performance comparison
"vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" size comparison. Which to choose?
The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.
The "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" has a width of 76.1mm, a length of 164.3mm, and a thickness of 8.4mm. Also, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a width of 80.9mm, a length of 161.7mm, and a thickness of 7.9mm.
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" is smaller and more compact compared to the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". For that reason, the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" is easier to grip firmly and carry one-handed than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". For that reason, we recommend the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB".
Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | |
---|---|---|
vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB | 59/100 | 76.1mm x 164.3mm x 8.4mm |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 52/100 | 80.9mm x 161.7mm x 7.9mm |
"vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison
The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.
The weight of the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" is about 190.0g, and the weight of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is about 210.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" is a lighter smart phone than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", with a difference of about 20g. For that reason the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" is a smart phone that is less likely than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"to put a burden on your fingers and wrist when used for an extended period. That's why we recommend the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" over the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB".
Score | Weight | |
---|---|---|
vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB | 54/100 | 190.0g |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 48/100 | 210.0g |
"vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", whose display is easier to use?
The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.
The "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" has a 6.55inch display. Also, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a 6.0inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Display size | |
---|---|---|
vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB | 90/100 | 6.55inch |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 90/100 | 6.0inch |
"vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", which has a clearer display?
Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.
The resolution on the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" is 720 x 1612, and pixel density is 269ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is 1080 x 1920, and pixel density is 367ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has much higher pixel density than the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB", with a difference of roughly 98ppi. In terms of having better picture quality and exerting less strain on the eyes, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is superior to the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is easy on the eyes, displaying texts and pictures clearly without any blurring, we recommend the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" over the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB".
Score | Pixel density | |
---|---|---|
vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB | 54/100 | 269ppi |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 77/100 | 367ppi |
"vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", a summary of the differences in battery life
Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.
Score | Battery capacity | |
---|---|---|
vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB | - /100 | |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 83/100 | 5000.0mAh |
"vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", which has better CPU?
CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.
The "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB"'s CPU is a MediaTek Helio G85, with performance measured at 2.0GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"'s CPU is a Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652, with performance measured at 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" has considerably higher specs than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". In terms of being able to comfortably play games and run apps smoothly, the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" is superior to the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". If you're going for a high spec smart phone that runs smoothly and comfortably handles games, we recommend purchasing the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" over the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB".
Score | CPU specs | |
---|---|---|
vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB | 89/100 | 2.0GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 75/100 | 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
"vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?
RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.
The weight of the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" is 6.0GB and the weight of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is 4.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" has a significantly larger amount of RAM than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", with a difference of about 2GB. In terms of the unlikeliness of crashing and the ease of multitasking, 3D games and VR, the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" is superior to the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". If you're looking for a smart phone that can run multiple apps simultaneously with stability and also allows you to comfortably enjoy 3D games and VR, then we recommend purchasing the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" over the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB".
Score | RAM size | |
---|---|---|
vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB | 90/100 | 6.0GB |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 70/100 | 4.0GB |
"vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", which has more data storage?
Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.
The data storage capacity of the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" is 128.0GB. Also the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is 32.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" has a much larger data storage capacity compared to the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", with a roughly 96GB difference. In terms of the number of pictures you can save and the applications that you can install, the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" is superior to the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that can save more data, we recommend the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" over the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB".
Score | Storage size | |
---|---|---|
vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB | 90/100 | 128.0GB |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 55/100 | 32.0GB |
"vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" has a 50.0MP main camera. Also, "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a 16.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" has a much higher pixel count compared to the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", with a roughly 34MP difference. In terms of taking or shooting high resolution pictures or videos that will look clean when printed, the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" is superior to the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". If you are looking for a smartphone that is suited for shooting videos and taking pictures, we recommend the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" over the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB".
Score | Rear-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB | 98/100 | 50.0MP |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 68/100 | 16.0MP |
"vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?
One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.
"vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" has an 8.0MP front camera and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has an 8.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.
Score | Front-camera resolution | |
---|---|---|
vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | 58/100 | 8.0MP |
"vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB" and "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", performance comparison by specification sheet
vivo Y22 (2022) 128GB | Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | |
Image | ||
Maker | vivo | Samsung |
Release date | 2022-09-05 | 2016-05 |
Color | Starlite Blue/Metaverse Green/Summer Cyan | White/Black/Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 76.1mm x 164.3mm x 8.4mm | 80.9mm x 161.7mm x 7.9mm |
Weight | 190.0g | 210.0g |
Display size | 6.55inch | 6.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1612 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 269ppi | 367ppi |
Chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 | Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 |
CPU specs | 2.0GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 6.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 128.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 50.0MP | 16.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |