Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Vivo S16 Pro 512GB vs Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB: Specs & Scores

Created date: 2022-12-23 16:51:06

vivo S16 Pro 512GBSamsung Galaxy M53 128GB
vivo S16 Pro 512GBSamsung Galaxy M53 128GB

How did the evaluations between the "vivo S16 Pro 512GB" and "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB" differ when we compared the two? We reviewed each of the most commonly scrutinized features. If you are thinking about which smartphone to get, check out this review immediately!

vivo S16 Pro 512GBSamsung Galaxy M53 128GB
vivo S16 Pro 512GB

Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB

General rating:

81.7/100

(The 5124th of all smartphones)

77.5/100

(The 4234th of all smartphones)

Holding comfort
64/100
60/100
Weight
57/100
60/100
Screen size
91/100
91/100
Display quality
82/100
83/100
Battery life
- /100
- /100
Processing power
100/100
91/100
Memory capacity
99/100
90/100
Storage capacity
95/100
90/100
Rear camera performance
98/100
100/100
Front camera performance
100/100
97/100

"vivo S16 Pro 512GB" and "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB", performance comparison

"vivo S16 Pro 512GB" and "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB" size comparison. Which to choose?

The size of the body has a big influence on the ease of carrying and one-handed operation. The narrower the width, the easier it is to firmly grasp and hold, but you also have to take into account the device's thickness. Also, if the width and height are smaller, its easier to operate one-handed since its easier to extend your fingers. On the contrary, if the width and height are large, it's difficult to fit in your pocket and is bulky even when put in a bag, and portability is impaired.

The "vivo S16 Pro 512GB" has a width of 74.8mm, a length of 164.1mm, and a thickness of 7.4mm. Also, the "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB" has a width of 77.0mm, a length of 164.7mm, and a thickness of 7.4mm.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't much difference between the "vivo S16 Pro 512GB" and "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB" in terms of size. For that reason, the ease of gripping and carrying the devices in one hand is about the same for both. Therefore it's better to compare them in terms of performance and functionality.

Comparing the width and thickness of the body, there isn't a large difference in size between the "vivo S16 Pro 512GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB". For that reason their one-handed operability, portability, and bulkiness when carried is about the same. That's why I think it's better to compare them in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

Comparing the overall size of the two devices, there isn't a big difference in size between the "vivo S16 Pro 512GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB". For that reason the ease of carrying and use with one hand is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDimensions (width x height x thickness)
vivo S16 Pro 512GB64/10074.8mm x 164.1mm x 7.4mm
Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB60/10077.0mm x 164.7mm x 7.4mm

"vivo S16 Pro 512GB" and "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB", which is more comfortable to hold? Weight comparison

The weight of the device affects hand fatigue and the burden placed upon the wrist. The lighter it is, the longer you'll be able to operate the device without tiring. Also, if the burden placed on the wrist is lower, you'll be able to use the device more comfortably. However if the weight isn't right for you, it could place more of a burden on your body, causing you to feel stress.

The weight of the "vivo S16 Pro 512GB" is about 182.0g, and the weight of the "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB" is about 176.0g. Comparing the weight of the two devices, there isn't much difference in weight between the "vivo S16 Pro 512GB" and "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB". That's why the likelihood of fatigue in the fingers and wrists after extended use is about the same for both. That's why it is better to compare the two in terms of other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreWeight
vivo S16 Pro 512GB57/100182.0g
Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB60/100176.0g

"vivo S16 Pro 512GB" and "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB", whose display is easier to use?

The size of the screen affects usability and screen visibility. A larger screen means larger letters and buttons on apps, so the user is less likely to tap adjacent buttons by mistake. In addition, the user can enjoy a more intense experience when playing games and watching videos.

The "vivo S16 Pro 512GB" has a 6.78inch display. Also, the "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB" has a 6.7inch display. Comparing the screen size, there is a negligible difference in screen size between the "vivo S16 Pro 512GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB". As a result, the app buttons on both are equally easy to press. We recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreDisplay size
vivo S16 Pro 512GB91/1006.78inch
Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB91/1006.7inch

"vivo S16 Pro 512GB" and "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB", which has a clearer display?

Pixel density affects picture quality, and the higher the pixel density, the better the picture quality, which means the user can gain more enjoyment from games and videos. In addition, higher picture quality decreases eyestrain, which means that the user will experience less eye fatigue after prolonged use.

The resolution on the "vivo S16 Pro 512GB" is 1080 x 2400, and pixel density is 388ppi. Also, the resolution on the "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB" is 1080 x 2408, and pixel density is 393ppi. Comparing the pixel count, the difference in pixel density between the "vivo S16 Pro 512GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB" is negligible. As a result, they are both evenly matched in terms of picture quality and easiness on the eyes. Therefore, we recommend comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScorePixel density
vivo S16 Pro 512GB82/100388ppi
Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB83/100393ppi

"vivo S16 Pro 512GB" and "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB", a summary of the differences in battery life

Battery performance greatly affects battery life, but greater battery capacity does not necessarily mean greater battery life, since battery efficiency should also be considered. Bigger screens and higher CPU performance will mean the batteries are depleted more quickly.

ScoreBattery capacity
vivo S16 Pro 512GB - /100
Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB - /100

"vivo S16 Pro 512GB" and "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB", which has better CPU?

CPU performance affects the ability to process programs, and the ability to process programs is determined by the product of the number of cores in the CPU and the CPU frequency. The higher this performance is, the more smoothly apps and games will run, and with low performance apps and games become heavy and stress is experienced.

The "vivo S16 Pro 512GB"'s CPU is a MediaTek Dimensity 8200, with performance measured at 3.1GHz+3.0GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Also, the "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB"'s CPU is a MediaTek MT6877 Dimensity 900 5G, with performance measured at 2.4GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). Comparing CPU performance, the "vivo S16 Pro 512GB" has higher specs compared to the "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB". For that reason, the "vivo S16 Pro 512GB" allows for more comfortable use of apps, and games that run more smoothly. That's why we recommend the "vivo S16 Pro 512GB" over the "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB".

ScoreCPU specs
vivo S16 Pro 512GB100/1003.1GHz+3.0GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)
Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB91/1002.4GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)

"vivo S16 Pro 512GB" and "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB", what's the difference in memory capacity?

RAM affects multitasking ability and the stability of apps. The larger the amount of RAM is, the more stability there will be even in situations where multiple apps are running simultaneously, allowing for comfortable use. In addition, animation will be more smooth, and apps will be less likely to freeze or crash. Also, without sufficient RAM, there are games you won't be able to run, so it is necessary to be careful.

The weight of the "vivo S16 Pro 512GB" is 12.0GB and the weight of the "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB" is 6.0GB. Comparing the devices in terms of RAM, the "vivo S16 Pro 512GB" has more RAM than the "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB", with a difference of about 6GB. For that reason the "vivo S16 Pro 512GB" allows for smoother multitasking than the "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB", and apps are less likely to crash. In addition the "vivo S16 Pro 512GB" allows for smoother enjoyment of 3D games and VR. For this reason, we recommend the "vivo S16 Pro 512GB".

ScoreRAM size
vivo S16 Pro 512GB99/10012.0GB
Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB90/1006.0GB

"vivo S16 Pro 512GB" and "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB", which has more data storage?

Storage capacity affects the amount of data that is capable of being stored. The larger the storage capacity, the more pictures you can take and the more applications you can install. In addition, if your smartphone accepts SD cards, then you can increase its storage capacity. However, there are performance related drawbacks, including a slower data transfer rate than the primary memory, and you cannot transfer all your data on the card, so be warned.

The data storage capacity of the "vivo S16 Pro 512GB" is 512.0GB. Also the "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB" is 128.0GB. Regarding storage capacity, there is a negligible difference in storage capacity between the "vivo S16 Pro 512GB" and "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB". As a result, you can save roughly the same amount of pictures, and install roughly the same amount of applications, on either phone. You are better off comparing them based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreStorage size
vivo S16 Pro 512GB95/100512.0GB
Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB90/100128.0GB

"vivo S16 Pro 512GB" and "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB" rear camera performance comparison. Which has a higher resolution?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the back of the device (the rear/back camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"vivo S16 Pro 512GB" has a 50.0MP main camera. Also, "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB" has a 108.0MP main camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "vivo S16 Pro 512GB" and "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreRear-camera resolution
vivo S16 Pro 512GB98/10050.0MP
Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB100/100108.0MP

"vivo S16 Pro 512GB" and "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB", whose front camera has a better picture quality?

One factor that determines the performance of the exterior camera located on the front of the device (the in/front camera) is the pixel count. The larger the pixel count, the higher the resolution of the pictures you can take, and the cleaner the pictures will look when printed.

"vivo S16 Pro 512GB" has an 50.0MP front camera and "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB" has an 32.0MP front camera. Comparing rear camera performance, the "vivo S16 Pro 512GB" and "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB" have approximately the same pixel count. As a result, they can both take pictures and shoot videos of roughly the same quality. Therefore, we recommend comparing the two based on other aspects of performance and functionality.

ScoreFront-camera resolution
vivo S16 Pro 512GB100/10050.0MP
Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB97/10032.0MP

"vivo S16 Pro 512GB" and "Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB", performance comparison by specification sheet

vivo S16 Pro 512GBSamsung Galaxy M53 128GB
Imagevivo S16 Pro 512GBSamsung Galaxy M53 128GB
MakervivoSamsung
Release date2022-12-302022-04-22
ColorBlack/MintGreen/Blue/Brown
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)74.8mm x 164.1mm x 7.4mm77.0mm x 164.7mm x 7.4mm
Weight182.0g176.0g
Display size6.78inch6.7inch
Display typeAMOLEDSuper AMOLED Plus
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 24001080 x 2408
Pixel density388ppi393ppi
ChipsetMediaTek Dimensity 8200MediaTek MT6877 Dimensity 900 5G
CPU specs3.1GHz+3.0GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)2.4GHz+2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size12.0GB6.0GB
Storage size512.0GB128.0GB
Rear-camera resolution50.0MP108.0MP
Front-camera resolution50.0MP32.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

Articles related to vivo S16 Pro 512GB
Articles related to Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB

vivo S16 Pro 512GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as vivo S16 Pro 512GB

Articles related to vivo S16 Pro 512GB
Articles related to Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB

Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB

Search for smartphone with similar ratings as Samsung Galaxy M53 128GB

New articles