Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB and Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB review

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:31:25, Updated date: 2021-10-20 20:11:42

Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

How are the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

General rating:

49/100

(The 1538th of all smartphones)

45.9/100

(The 677th of all smartphones)

Grip
58/100
63/100
Screen quality
56/100
56/100
Performance
56/100
47/100
Storage size
78/100
70/100
Battery
100/100
76/100
Rear-camera resolution
50/100
50/100
Front-camera resolution
65/100
50/100

What is the difference between the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

The design of Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB

The "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" is 143.0mm long, 69.9mm wide, and 8.5mm thick. It weighs 183.0g.

The design of Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is 145.6mm long, 71.8mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 149.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 2.5mm in length, 1.8mm in width, and 0.5mm in thickness. Both the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". Both the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 34g. The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand71/10070/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand30/10054/100
Ease of carrying around64/10063/100

Compare the display of the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

Display of the Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB

The "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Display of the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size.

There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" nor the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?68/10068/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?60/10060/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

Camera performance of Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB

The main camera of the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The main camera of the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones.

There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?50/10050/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/10050/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

The processing capability of the Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6735 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

The processing capability of the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" uses the Broadcom BCM23550 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB", the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" are not large at all. For people who mostly use their phone to look up things on the internet, watch videos, or occasionally play mini games, the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" edges out the competition.

For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" than the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB".

Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet73/10070/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games45/10031/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

Battery performance of Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB

The "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" over the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". Both the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10076/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10055/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

The storage capacity of the Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB

The "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

The "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 240GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games78/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos90/10059/100

Which to buy, the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" or "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" or "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB"?

When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" is better for users who prefer better functionality and specs. Between the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" and the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB", the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" is overall the clear winner.

Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB

Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB

Handling58/10063/100
Display56/10056/100
CPU specs56/10047/100
General rating66/10056/100

Is it recommended to buy the Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Judging from the overall specs, the "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GB" and "Celkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
Gionee Marathon M5 lite 32GBCelkon Q500 Millennium Ultra 16GB
ColorGold/GrayWhite
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)69.9mm x 143.0mm x 8.5mm71.8mm x 145.6mm x 8.0mm
Weight183.0g149.0g
Display size5.0inch5.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280720 x 1280
Pixel density293ppi293ppi
Battery capacity4000.0mAh2500.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6735Broadcom BCM23550
CPU specs1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB2.0GB
Storage size32.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP2.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles