A comparive review of the differences between the BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB and Lava A97 (2016) 8GB. We covered a wide range of variables
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:37:11, Updated date: 2021-10-20 17:02:38
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB".
Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB | |||
General rating: | 41/100 (The 1711th of all smartphones) | 39.6/100 (The 812th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 60/100 | 71/100 | ||
Screen quality | 48/100 | 43/100 | ||
Performance | 28/100 | 27/100 | ||
Storage size | 35/100 | 17/100 | ||
Battery | 79/100 | 66/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 35/100 | 50/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 65/100 | - /100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" and the "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" or "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" and the "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB"
The design of Lava A97 (2016) 8GB
The "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" is 145.5mm long, 72.0mm wide, and 9.2mm thick. It weighs 160.0g.
The design of BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB
The "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" is 131.9mm long, 66.7mm wide, and 8.5mm thick. It weighs 128.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 13.5mm in length, 5.2mm in width, and 0.6mm in thickness. "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" is bigger than "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Also, "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" is more compact than "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 32g. The "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 68/100 | 75/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 46/100 | 71/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 62/100 | 67/100 |
Compare the display of the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB"
Display of the Lava A97 (2016) 8GB
The "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 195ppi. The "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Display of the BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB
The "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 540 x 960, and the pixel density is 244ppi. The "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" has a 4.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. In the gaming end, the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" offers a more suitable screen size.
In terms of display, the "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" nor the "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 68/100 | 59/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 60/100 | 41/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB"
Camera performance of Lava A97 (2016) 8GB
The main camera of the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB
The main camera of the "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. The "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts.
Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 35/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | - |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB"
The processing capability of the Lava A97 (2016) 8GB
The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
The processing capability of the BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8926 Snapdragon 400 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
The CPU specs are the same for both phones. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.
For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" and the "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" and the "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" equally.
There is basically no difference between "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used. Neither the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" nor the "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 47/100 | 44/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 12/100 | 11/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB"
Battery performance of Lava A97 (2016) 8GB
The "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2350.0mAh.
Battery performance of BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB
The "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" has a battery capacity of 1840.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 510mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you use the phone infrequently for just making calls or checking the time, I think the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" is a bit better. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" over the "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB". The "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.
Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 79/100 | 66/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 61/100 | 42/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB"
The storage capacity of the Lava A97 (2016) 8GB
The "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB
The "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 4GB. The "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. Neither the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" nor the "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 28GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" is recommended over "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos.
Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 35/100 | 17/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 56/100 | 65/100 |
Which to buy, the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" or "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" or "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" is a great choice. If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB". There isn't much difference between "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 60/100 | 71/100 |
Display | 48/100 | 43/100 |
CPU specs | 28/100 | 27/100 |
General rating | 48/100 | 44/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Lava A97 (2016) 8GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Lava A97 (2016) 8GB" and "BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Lava A97 (2016) 8GB | BenQ T3 (2014) 4GB | |
Color | Black/Gold/Gray | Black/White/Green |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 72.0mm x 145.5mm x 9.2mm | 66.7mm x 131.9mm x 8.5mm |
Weight | 160.0g | 128.0g |
Display size | 5.0inch | 4.5inch |
Display type | TFT | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 480 x 854 | 540 x 960 |
Pixel density | 195ppi | 244ppi |
Battery capacity | 2350.0mAh | 1840.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8926 Snapdragon 400 | |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 1.0GB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 8.0GB | 4.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |