Lava A32 (2016) 512MB vs ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:12:46, Updated date: 2022-06-02 18:05:34
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" and "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" and "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" and the "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" and "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" and "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" and "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" and "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" and "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" and "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" or "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" and "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" and the "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" and "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB"
The design of Lava A32 (2016) 512MB
The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is 124.4mm long, 64.6mm wide, and 10.8mm thick. It weighs 92.0g.
The design of ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB
The "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" is 128.0mm long, 64.0mm wide, and 10.1mm thick. It weighs 131.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 3.5mm in length, 0.5mm in width, and 0.7mm in thickness. Both the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" and "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" and "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB". Both the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" and "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 39g. The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Lava A32 (2016) 512MB | ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 75/100 | 76/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 100/100 | 69/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 67/100 | 68/100 |
Compare the display of the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" and "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB"
Display of the Lava A32 (2016) 512MB
The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 800, and the pixel density is 233ppi. The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has a 4.0inch screen size.
Display of the ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB
The "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 341ppi. The "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" has a 4.3inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" makes it more suited for playing games. The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB". The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Lava A32 (2016) 512MB | ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 46/100 | 56/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 25/100 | 33/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" and "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB"
Camera performance of Lava A32 (2016) 512MB
The main camera of the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has 2.0MP.
Camera performance of ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB
The main camera of the "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" has 13.1MP. The front camera has 1.3MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 11.1MP difference in comparison. The "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Lava A32 (2016) 512MB | ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 20/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | - | 46/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" and "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB"
The processing capability of the Lava A32 (2016) 512MB
The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores). The memory capacity is 256.0MB.
The processing capability of the ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" uses the OMAP4430 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
The CPU specs are the same for both phones. This is a 255MB difference in memory capacity. The "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" has more memory storage, making the "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB". For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" and the "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" equally. Neither the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" nor the "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
There is basically no difference between "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" and "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" as it has better performance. Neither the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" nor the "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Lava A32 (2016) 512MB | ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 17/100 | 24/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 3/100 | 9/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" and "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB"
Battery performance of Lava A32 (2016) 512MB
The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has a battery capacity of 1500.0mAh.
Battery performance of ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB
The "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" has a battery capacity of 1460.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 40mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" over the "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB". The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Lava A32 (2016) 512MB | ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 70/100 | 42/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 44/100 | 20/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" and "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB"
The storage capacity of the Lava A32 (2016) 512MB
The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has 512.0MB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB
The "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 504MB. The "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" unfortunately falls behind here. Neither the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" nor the "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 8GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" or "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB".
Lava A32 (2016) 512MB | ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 2/100 | 35/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 54/100 | 56/100 |
Which to buy, the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" or "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" or "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB"?
"Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 4.3inch makes the "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" a lot easier to use. "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" is better for users who prefer better functionality and specs. When comparing "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" overall, "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.
Lava A32 (2016) 512MB | ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 78/100 | 72/100 |
Display | 34/100 | 49/100 |
CPU specs | 11/100 | 19/100 |
General rating | 39/100 | 45/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Lava A32 (2016) 512MB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. Judging from the overall specs, the "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" and "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" and "ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Lava A32 (2016) 512MB | ARROWS Z ISW11F au 8GB | |
Color | Black/White | / / / |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 64.6mm x 124.4mm x 10.8mm | 64.0mm x 128.0mm x 10.1mm |
Weight | 92.0g | 131.0g |
Display size | 4.0inch | 4.3inch |
Display type | TFT | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 480 x 800 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 233ppi | 341ppi |
Battery capacity | 1500.0mAh | 1460.0mAh |
Chipset | OMAP4430 | |
CPU specs | 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores) | 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores) |
RAM size | 256.0MB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 512.0MB | 8.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 2.0MP | 13.1MP |
Front-camera resolution | 1.3MP | |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |