Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

A comparive review of the differences between the Lava A32 (2016) 512MB and Lava A76 (2016) 8GB. We covered a wide range of variables

Created date: 2018-09-30 21:59:36, Updated date: 2022-06-02 16:52:24

Lava A76 (2016) 8GBLava A32 (2016) 512MB
Lava A76 (2016) 8GBLava A32 (2016) 512MB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB".

Lava A76 (2016) 8GBLava A32 (2016) 512MB
Lava A76 (2016) 8GB

Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

General rating:
Griprating-image3.3
65/100
rating-image3.9
78/100
Screen qualityrating-image2.1
41/100
rating-image1.7
34/100
Performancerating-image1.5
30/100
rating-image1
11/100
Storage sizerating-image1.8
35/100
rating-image1
2/100
Batteryrating-image3.7
73/100
rating-image3.5
70/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image1.8
35/100
rating-image1.0
20/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image
- /100
rating-image
- /100

What is the difference between the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" and the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"

The design of Lava A76 (2016) 8GB

The "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" is 145.5mm long, 72.0mm wide, and 9.1mm thick. It weighs 135.0g.

The design of Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is 124.4mm long, 64.6mm wide, and 10.8mm thick. It weighs 92.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 21mm in length, 7.4mm in width, and 1.7mm in thickness. "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is bigger than "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Also, "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is more compact than "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 43g. The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Lava A76 (2016) 8GB

Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

Ease of holding it in one hand68/10075/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand65/100100/100
Ease of carrying around62/10067/100

Compare the display of the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"

Display of the Lava A76 (2016) 8GB

The "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" uses a TN liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 217ppi. The "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" has a 4.5inch screen size.

Display of the Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 800, and the pixel density is 233ppi. The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has a 4.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. In the gaming end, the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" nor the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Lava A76 (2016) 8GB

Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?59/10046/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?41/10025/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"

Camera performance of Lava A76 (2016) 8GB

The main camera of the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

The main camera of the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has 2.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. The "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts.

Lava A76 (2016) 8GB

Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?35/10020/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? - -

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"

The processing capability of the Lava A76 (2016) 8GB

The CPU performance is 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.

The processing capability of the Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores). The memory capacity is 256.0MB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 255GB difference in memory capacity. The "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" has more memory storage, making the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB". The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" as it has better performance. Neither the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" nor the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Lava A76 (2016) 8GB

Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet53/10017/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games12/1003/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"

Battery performance of Lava A76 (2016) 8GB

The "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" has a battery capacity of 1850.0mAh.

Battery performance of Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has a battery capacity of 1500.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 350mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" and the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB". Both the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" and the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

If you're playing games or watching movies for a longer amount of time, or plan on using it for long periods, the battery of the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" may be slightly better.

Lava A76 (2016) 8GB

Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet73/10070/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos51/10044/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"

The storage capacity of the Lava A76 (2016) 8GB

The "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has 512.0MB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 504GB. The "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" unfortunately falls behind here. Neither the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" nor the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 8GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" or "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB".

Lava A76 (2016) 8GB

Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games35/1002/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos56/10054/100

Which to buy, the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" or "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" or "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is a great choice. If you want a larger screen, "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" is recommended as it has a 4.5inch screen. The "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" overall, "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.

Lava A76 (2016) 8GB

Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

Handling65/10078/100
Display41/10034/100
CPU specs30/10011/100
General rating46/10039/100

Is it recommended to buy the Lava A76 (2016) 8GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the Lava A32 (2016) 512MB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Lava A76 (2016) 8GB" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Lava A76 (2016) 8GBLava A32 (2016) 512MB
Lava A76 (2016) 8GBLava A32 (2016) 512MB
ColorBlack/WhiteBlack/White
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)72.0mm x 145.5mm x 9.1mm64.6mm x 124.4mm x 10.8mm
Weight135.0g92.0g
Display size4.5inch4.0inch
Display typeTNTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)480 x 854480 x 800
Pixel density217ppi233ppi
Battery capacity1850.0mAh1500.0mAh
Chipset
CPU specs1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores)
RAM size1.0GB256.0MB
Storage size8.0GB512.0MB
Rear-camera resolution5.0MP2.0MP
Front-camera resolution

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles