Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

LG K4 (2017) vs. Lava A32 (2016) 512MB Specs & Scores

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:42:08, Updated date: 2022-06-02 17:34:56

LG K4 (2017)Lava A32 (2016) 512MB
LG K4 (2017)Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

How are the "LG K4 (2017)" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

LG K4 (2017)Lava A32 (2016) 512MB
LG K4 (2017)

Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

General rating:

40.2/100

(The 1726th of all smartphones)

37.7/100

(The 1793th of all smartphones)

Grip
65/100
78/100
Screen quality
48/100
34/100
Performance
26/100
11/100
Storage size
35/100
2/100
Battery
85/100
70/100
Rear-camera resolution
35/100
20/100
Front-camera resolution
65/100
- /100

What is the difference between the "LG K4 (2017)" and the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "LG K4 (2017)" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"

The design of LG K4 (2017)

The "LG K4 (2017)" is 144.7mm long, 72.6mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 138.0g.

The design of Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is 124.4mm long, 64.6mm wide, and 10.8mm thick. It weighs 92.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 20.2mm in length, 8mm in width, and 2.9mm in thickness. "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is bigger than "LG K4 (2017)", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "LG K4 (2017)" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 46g. The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

LG K4 (2017)

Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

Ease of holding it in one hand69/10075/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand63/100100/100
Ease of carrying around62/10067/100

Compare the display of the "LG K4 (2017)" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"

Display of the LG K4 (2017)

The "LG K4 (2017)" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 195ppi. The "LG K4 (2017)" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Display of the Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 800, and the pixel density is 233ppi. The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has a 4.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 1inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "LG K4 (2017)" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. In the gaming end, the "LG K4 (2017)" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "LG K4 (2017)" nor the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

LG K4 (2017)

Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?68/10046/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?60/10025/100

Compare the camera performances of the "LG K4 (2017)" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"

Camera performance of LG K4 (2017)

The main camera of the "LG K4 (2017)" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

The main camera of the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has 2.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. The "LG K4 (2017)" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "LG K4 (2017)"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts.

LG K4 (2017)

Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?35/10020/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/100 -

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "LG K4 (2017)" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"

The processing capability of the LG K4 (2017)

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "LG K4 (2017)" uses the Qualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.1GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.

The processing capability of the Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores). The memory capacity is 256.0MB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", the "LG K4 (2017)" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 255GB difference in memory capacity. The "LG K4 (2017)" has more memory storage, making the "LG K4 (2017)" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "LG K4 (2017)" is the better choice to buy over the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "LG K4 (2017)". The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "LG K4 (2017)" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "LG K4 (2017)" as it has better performance. Neither the "LG K4 (2017)" nor the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

LG K4 (2017)

Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet41/10017/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games11/1003/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "LG K4 (2017)" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"

Battery performance of LG K4 (2017)

The "LG K4 (2017)" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.

Battery performance of Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has a battery capacity of 1500.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "LG K4 (2017)" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "LG K4 (2017)" over the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB". Both the "LG K4 (2017)" and the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "LG K4 (2017)" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "LG K4 (2017)" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

LG K4 (2017)

Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet85/10070/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos71/10044/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "LG K4 (2017)" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"

The storage capacity of the LG K4 (2017)

The "LG K4 (2017)" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has 512.0MB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 504GB. The "LG K4 (2017)" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "LG K4 (2017)" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" unfortunately falls behind here. Neither the "LG K4 (2017)" nor the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 8GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "LG K4 (2017)" or "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB".

LG K4 (2017)

Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games35/1002/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos56/10054/100

Which to buy, the "LG K4 (2017)" or "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "LG K4 (2017)" or "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.0inch makes the "LG K4 (2017)" a lot easier to use. The "LG K4 (2017)" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "LG K4 (2017)" and the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", the "LG K4 (2017)" is overall the clear winner.

LG K4 (2017)

Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

Handling65/10078/100
Display48/10034/100
CPU specs26/10011/100
General rating49/10039/100

Is it recommended to buy the LG K4 (2017), compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "LG K4 (2017)" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "LG K4 (2017)" is a mid-range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the Lava A32 (2016) 512MB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "LG K4 (2017)" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "LG K4 (2017)" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

LG K4 (2017)Lava A32 (2016) 512MB
LG K4 (2017)Lava A32 (2016) 512MB
ColorBlack/TitanBlack/White
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)72.6mm x 144.7mm x 7.9mm64.6mm x 124.4mm x 10.8mm
Weight138.0g92.0g
Display size5.0inch4.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)480 x 854480 x 800
Pixel density195ppi233ppi
Battery capacity2500.0mAh1500.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210
CPU specs1.1GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores)
RAM size1.0GB256.0MB
Storage size8.0GB512.0MB
Rear-camera resolution5.0MP2.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles