Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which one is better, the ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB or Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:15:56, Updated date: 2020-04-15 17:33:51

Motorola Moto Z Play 32GBARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
Motorola Moto Z Play 32GBARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

How are the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Motorola Moto Z Play 32GBARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB

ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

General rating:

64.7/100

(The 1167th of all smartphones)

56.8/100

(The 422th of all smartphones)

Grip
56/100
62/100
Screen quality
74/100
70/100
Performance
85/100
51/100
Storage size
78/100
84/100
Battery
96/100
81/100
Rear-camera resolution
80/100
72/100
Front-camera resolution
65/100
46/100

What is the difference between the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"

The design of Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB

The "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" is 156.4mm long, 76.4mm wide, and 7.0mm thick. It weighs 165.0g.

The design of ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is 139.0mm long, 69.0mm wide, and 9.8mm thick. It weighs 158.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 17.4mm in length, 7.4mm in width, and 2.8mm in thickness. "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is bigger than "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 7g. There is very little difference in weight between the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.

Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB

ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

Ease of holding it in one hand63/10071/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand42/10047/100
Ease of carrying around59/10064/100

Compare the display of the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"

Display of the Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB

The "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 400ppi. The "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Display of the ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 440ppi. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The display of "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" looks sleeker than that of "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB". The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB

ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?72/10068/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?73/10060/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"

Camera performance of Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB

The main camera of the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

The main camera of the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has 13.1MP. The front camera has 1.25MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 2.9MP difference in comparison. As for taking photos of scenic places or group photos of people, the rear camera of "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" is more suited for capturing distant objects. The "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is a 3.75MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB

ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?80/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/10046/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"

The processing capability of the Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8953 Snapdragon 625 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

The processing capability of the ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" uses the Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T SoC. The CPU performance is 1.7GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB", the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB". The "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" than the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB". The "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB

ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet92/10073/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games76/10035/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"

Battery performance of Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB

The "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3510.0mAh.

Battery performance of ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has a battery capacity of 3020.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 490mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you use the phone infrequently for just making calls or checking the time, I think the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" is a bit better. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" over the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB". Both the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB

ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet96/10081/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos89/10064/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"

The storage capacity of the Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB

The "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 32GB. "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 160GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. Both the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" and the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB

ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games78/10084/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos90/10075/100

Which to buy, the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" or "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" or "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB"?

"ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB". The "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" overall, "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.

Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB

ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB

Handling56/10062/100
Display74/10070/100
CPU specs85/10051/100
General rating75/10066/100

Is it recommended to buy the Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Motorola Moto Z Play 32GB" and "ARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Motorola Moto Z Play 32GBARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
Motorola Moto Z Play 32GBARROWS A 202F SoftBank 64GB
ColorBlack+Silver+Black Slate/White+Fine Gold+Sugar White/ / /
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)76.4mm x 156.4mm x 7.0mm69.0mm x 139.0mm x 9.8mm
Weight165.0g158.0g
Display size5.5inch5.0inch
Display typeSuper AMOLEDTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 19201080 x 1920
Pixel density400ppi440ppi
Battery capacity3510.0mAh3020.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8953 Snapdragon 625Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T
CPU specs2.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.7GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB2.0GB
Storage size32.0GB64.0GB
Rear-camera resolution16.0MP13.1MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP1.25MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles