Nokia Lumia 635 8GB vs FLEAZ Que +N: Which is the best?
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:39:32, Updated date: 2020-04-16 20:56:31
How are the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and "FLEAZ Que +N" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and the "FLEAZ Que +N"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and "FLEAZ Que +N"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and "FLEAZ Que +N"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and "FLEAZ Que +N"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and "FLEAZ Que +N"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and "FLEAZ Que +N"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and "FLEAZ Que +N"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" or "FLEAZ Que +N"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and "FLEAZ Que +N" ?
What is the difference between the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and the "FLEAZ Que +N"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and "FLEAZ Que +N"
The design of Nokia Lumia 635 8GB
The "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" is 129.5mm long, 66.7mm wide, and 9.2mm thick. It weighs 134.0g.
The design of FLEAZ Que +N
The "FLEAZ Que +N" is 133.0mm long, 67.0mm wide, and 10.35mm thick. It weighs 125.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 3.5mm in length, 0.2mm in width, and 1.15mm in thickness. Both the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and "FLEAZ Que +N" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and "FLEAZ Que +N". Both the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and "FLEAZ Que +N" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 9g. "FLEAZ Que +N" weighs less than "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and is easier to handle.
Nokia Lumia 635 8GB | FLEAZ Que +N | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 74/100 | 72/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 66/100 | 74/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 66/100 | 65/100 |
Compare the display of the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and "FLEAZ Que +N"
Display of the Nokia Lumia 635 8GB
The "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 217ppi. The "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" has a 4.5inch screen size.
Display of the FLEAZ Que +N
The "FLEAZ Que +N" uses a IPS liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 217ppi. The "FLEAZ Que +N" has a 4.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size.
There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and "FLEAZ Que +N" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" nor the "FLEAZ Que +N" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Nokia Lumia 635 8GB | FLEAZ Que +N | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 59/100 | 59/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 41/100 | 41/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and "FLEAZ Que +N"
Camera performance of Nokia Lumia 635 8GB
The main camera of the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of FLEAZ Que +N
The main camera of the "FLEAZ Que +N" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and "FLEAZ Que +N" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones.
Nokia Lumia 635 8GB | FLEAZ Que +N | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 35/100 | 35/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | - | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and "FLEAZ Que +N"
The processing capability of the Nokia Lumia 635 8GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
The processing capability of the FLEAZ Que +N
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "FLEAZ Que +N" uses the MediaTek MT6735A SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB", the "FLEAZ Que +N" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "FLEAZ Que +N" has more memory storage, making the "FLEAZ Que +N" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "FLEAZ Que +N" is the better choice to buy over the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "FLEAZ Que +N".
For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "FLEAZ Que +N" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "FLEAZ Que +N" than the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB". The "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Nokia Lumia 635 8GB | FLEAZ Que +N | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 44/100 | 71/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 11/100 | 32/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and "FLEAZ Que +N"
Battery performance of Nokia Lumia 635 8GB
The "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" has a battery capacity of 1830.0mAh.
Battery performance of FLEAZ Que +N
The "FLEAZ Que +N" has a battery capacity of 2200.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 370mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "FLEAZ Que +N" over the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB". The "FLEAZ Que +N" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "FLEAZ Que +N" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use.
Nokia Lumia 635 8GB | FLEAZ Que +N | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 65/100 | 84/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 41/100 | 69/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and "FLEAZ Que +N"
The storage capacity of the Nokia Lumia 635 8GB
The "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the FLEAZ Que +N
The "FLEAZ Que +N" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 8GB. The "FLEAZ Que +N" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "FLEAZ Que +N" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 120GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. Both the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and the "FLEAZ Que +N" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Nokia Lumia 635 8GB | FLEAZ Que +N | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 35/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 90/100 | 76/100 |
Which to buy, the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" or "FLEAZ Que +N"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" or "FLEAZ Que +N"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and "FLEAZ Que +N". If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and "FLEAZ Que +N". The "FLEAZ Que +N" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "FLEAZ Que +N" and "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" overall, "FLEAZ Que +N" is a more balanced model and is recommended.
Nokia Lumia 635 8GB | FLEAZ Que +N | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 69/100 | 70/100 |
Display | 41/100 | 41/100 |
CPU specs | 27/100 | 48/100 |
General rating | 47/100 | 57/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Nokia Lumia 635 8GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Is it recommended to buy the FLEAZ Que +N, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "FLEAZ Que +N" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Judging from the overall specs, the "FLEAZ Que +N" is a mid-range smartphone.
What are the spec differences between the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and "FLEAZ Que +N" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Nokia Lumia 635 8GB" and "FLEAZ Que +N". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Nokia Lumia 635 8GB | FLEAZ Que +N | |
Color | Bright Orange/bright green/bright yellow/white/black | -111 |
OS | Windows | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 66.7mm x 129.5mm x 9.2mm | 67.0mm x 133.0mm x 10.35mm |
Weight | 134.0g | 125.0g |
Display size | 4.5inch | 4.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 480 x 854 | 480 x 854 |
Pixel density | 217ppi | 217ppi |
Battery capacity | 1830.0mAh | 2200.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 | MediaTek MT6735A |
CPU specs | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 1.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 8.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 5.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone |