Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which one is better, the Lava A32 (2016) 512MB or OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:39:32, Updated date: 2022-06-02 18:32:20

OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GBLava A32 (2016) 512MB
OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GBLava A32 (2016) 512MB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB".

OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GBLava A32 (2016) 512MB
OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB

Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

General rating:

66.9/100

(The 1117th of all smartphones)

37.7/100

(The 1793th of all smartphones)

Grip
59/100
78/100
Screen quality
74/100
34/100
Performance
77/100
11/100
Storage size
84/100
2/100
Battery
87/100
70/100
Rear-camera resolution
80/100
20/100
Front-camera resolution
80/100
- /100

What is the difference between the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" and the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"

The design of OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB

The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is 152.7mm long, 74.7mm wide, and 7.4mm thick. It weighs 158.0g.

The design of Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is 124.4mm long, 64.6mm wide, and 10.8mm thick. It weighs 92.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 28.2mm in length, 10.1mm in width, and 3.4mm in thickness. "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. Flick typing is easier on the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is more compact than "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 66g. The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB

Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

Ease of holding it in one hand66/10075/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand47/100100/100
Ease of carrying around61/10067/100

Compare the display of the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"

Display of the OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB

The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" uses a Optic AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 400ppi. The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Display of the Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 800, and the pixel density is 233ppi. The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has a 4.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 1.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

In terms of display, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB". The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB

Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?72/10046/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?73/10025/100

Compare the camera performances of the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"

Camera performance of OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB

The main camera of the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

The main camera of the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has 2.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 14MP difference in comparison. The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB

Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?80/10020/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/100 -

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"

The processing capability of the OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 6.0GB.

The processing capability of the Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores). The memory capacity is 256.0MB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 250GB difference in memory capacity. The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB". The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" than the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB". The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB

Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet80/10017/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games75/1003/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"

Battery performance of OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB

The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has a battery capacity of 1500.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" over the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB". Both the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" and the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB

Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet87/10070/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos74/10044/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"

The storage capacity of the OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB

The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory.

The storage capacity of the Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

The "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has 512.0MB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 448GB. The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB

Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games84/1002/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos - 54/100

Which to buy, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" or "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" or "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" a lot easier to use. The "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" and the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB", the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is overall the clear winner.

OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB

Lava A32 (2016) 512MB

Handling59/10078/100
Display74/10034/100
CPU specs77/10011/100
General rating73/10039/100

Is it recommended to buy the OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Lava A32 (2016) 512MB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GB" and "Lava A32 (2016) 512MB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GBLava A32 (2016) 512MB
OnePlus 3 (2016) 64GBLava A32 (2016) 512MB
ColorGraphite/soft goldBlack/White
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)74.7mm x 152.7mm x 7.4mm64.6mm x 124.4mm x 10.8mm
Weight158.0g92.0g
Display size5.5inch4.0inch
Display typeOptic AMOLEDTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 1920480 x 800
Pixel density400ppi233ppi
Battery capacity3000.0mAh1500.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820
CPU specs2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.0GHz×1(1.0-cores)
RAM size6.0GB256.0MB
Storage size64.0GB512.0MB
Rear-camera resolution16.0MP2.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles