A comparive review of the differences between the Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB and Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB. We covered a wide range of variables
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:35:28, Updated date: 2021-10-20 16:06:26
How are the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" and the "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" or "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" and the "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB"
The design of Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB
The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" is 154.5mm long, 76.0mm wide, and 7.4mm thick. It weighs 160.0g.
The design of Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB
The "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB" is 140.8mm long, 70.4mm wide, and 8.9mm thick. It weighs 142.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 13.6mm in length, 5.5mm in width, and 1.5mm in thickness. "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB" is bigger than "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 18g. The "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB | Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 63/100 | 70/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 46/100 | 60/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 59/100 | 63/100 |
Compare the display of the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB"
Display of the Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB
The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Display of the Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB
The "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The display of "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB" looks sleeker than that of "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" nor the "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB | Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 72/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 73/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB"
Camera performance of Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB
The main camera of the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.
Camera performance of Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB
The main camera of the "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" and the "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 11MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB | Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB"
The processing capability of the Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" uses the Mediatek MT6755 or MTK7650 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
The processing capability of the Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6735 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB", the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB". The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" than the "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB". The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB | Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 88/100 | 73/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 82/100 | 45/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB"
Battery performance of Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB
The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 3075.0mAh.
Battery performance of Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB
The "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 575mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you use the phone infrequently for just making calls or checking the time, I think the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" is a bit better. For average daily use, for example looking things up online, SNS, gaming or occasionally checking your screen I can recommend the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" slightly more. Both the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" and the "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB | Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 88/100 | 82/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 76/100 | 66/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB"
The storage capacity of the Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB
The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB
The "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 48GB. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 272GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB | Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 84/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 91/100 | 59/100 |
Which to buy, the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" or "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" or "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB"?
"Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. If you want a larger screen, "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" is recommended as it has a 5.5inch screen. The "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" and the "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB", the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" is overall the clear winner.
Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB | Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 57/100 | 65/100 |
Display | 61/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 86/100 | 56/100 |
General rating | 75/100 | 62/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB" and "Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Oppo F1s (2016) 64GB | Coolpad Note 3 Lite 16GB | |
Color | Gold/Rose Gold/Gray | Black/White/Champagne white |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 76.0mm x 154.5mm x 7.4mm | 70.4mm x 140.8mm x 8.9mm |
Weight | 160.0g | 142.0g |
Display size | 5.5inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 267ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 3075.0mAh | 2500.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6755 or MTK7650 | Mediatek MT6735 |
CPU specs | 1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |