Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB vs MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB: Which is the best?
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:14:12, Updated date: 2020-04-15 18:45:08
How are the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB | MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | |||
General rating: | 41.3/100 (The 1705th of all smartphones) | 44.5/100 (The 702th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 62/100 | 69/100 | ||
Screen quality | 48/100 | 56/100 | ||
Performance | 26/100 | 27/100 | ||
Storage size | 70/100 | 35/100 | ||
Battery | 79/100 | 75/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 50/100 | 50/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 65/100 | 50/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" or "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
The design of Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB
The "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" is 144.5mm long, 73.0mm wide, and 8.6mm thick. It weighs 144.0g.
The design of MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is 142.8mm long, 70.4mm wide, and 8.4mm thick. It weighs 125.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 1.6mm in length, 2.5mm in width, and 0.1mm in thickness. Both the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". Both the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 19g. The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB | MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 67/100 | 71/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 58/100 | 74/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 61/100 | 64/100 |
Compare the display of the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
Display of the Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB
The "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 195ppi. The "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Display of the MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" uses a IPS liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size.
In terms of display, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. Neither the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" nor the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB | MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 68/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 60/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
Camera performance of Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB
The main camera of the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
The main camera of the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones.
There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB | MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 50/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | 50/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
The processing capability of the Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6737M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.1GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
The processing capability of the MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" uses the Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
The CPU specs are the same for both phones. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.
For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" equally.
There is basically no difference between "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used. Neither the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" nor the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB | MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 41/100 | 44/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 11/100 | 11/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
Battery performance of Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB
The "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2210.0mAh.
Battery performance of MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2300.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 90mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". Both the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
If you're playing games or watching movies for a longer amount of time, or plan on using it for long periods, the battery of the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" may be slightly better.
Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB | MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 79/100 | 75/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 61/100 | 54/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
The storage capacity of the Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB
The "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 8GB. The "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 24GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is recommended over "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos.
Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB | MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 70/100 | 35/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 59/100 | 66/100 |
Which to buy, the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" or "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" or "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"?
"MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. If you want a larger screen, "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is recommended as it has a 5.0inch screen. There isn't much difference between "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB | MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 62/100 | 69/100 |
Display | 48/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 26/100 | 27/100 |
General rating | 52/100 | 50/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Is it recommended to buy the MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
What are the spec differences between the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Panasonic P9 (2017) 16GB | MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | |
Color | Champagne Gold/Black | |
OS | Android | Windows |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 73.0mm x 144.5mm x 8.6mm | 70.4mm x 142.8mm x 8.4mm |
Weight | 144.0g | 125.0g |
Display size | 5.0inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 480 x 854 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 195ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 2210.0mAh | 2300.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6737M | Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 |
CPU specs | 1.1GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 1.0GB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 8.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 2.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |