Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB vs Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:40:49, Updated date: 2020-04-15 18:15:18

Plum Phantom (2017) 16GBNokia 3 (2017) 16GB
Plum Phantom (2017) 16GBNokia 3 (2017) 16GB

How are the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Plum Phantom (2017) 16GBNokia 3 (2017) 16GB
Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB

Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB

General rating:

43.4/100

(The 1658th of all smartphones)

52.8/100

(The 1447th of all smartphones)

Grip
50/100
65/100
Screen quality
62/100
56/100
Performance
28/100
48/100
Storage size
70/100
70/100
Battery
76/100
88/100
Rear-camera resolution
72/100
50/100
Front-camera resolution
80/100
80/100

What is the difference between the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" and the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB"

The design of Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB

The "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" is 165.5mm long, 84.2mm wide, and 8.8mm thick. It weighs 138.0g.

The design of Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB

The "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" is 143.4mm long, 71.4mm wide, and 8.5mm thick. It weighs 140.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 22mm in length, 12.7mm in width, and 0.3mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" for portability.

The difference in weight is 2g. There is very little difference in weight between the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.

Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB

Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand44/10070/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand63/10061/100
Ease of carrying around49/10063/100

Compare the display of the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB"

Display of the Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB

The "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 244ppi. The "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" has a 6.0inch screen size.

Display of the Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB

The "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 1inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. The "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" nor the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB

Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?76/10068/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?78/10060/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB"

Camera performance of Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB

The main camera of the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB

The main camera of the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.

Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB

Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10050/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/10080/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB"

The processing capability of the Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6580A SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.

The processing capability of the Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6737 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB", the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB".

For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" than the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB". The "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB

Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet47/10071/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games12/10033/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB"

Battery performance of Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB

The "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.

Battery performance of Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB

The "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2630.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 130mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" over the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB". Both the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" and the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB

Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet76/10088/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos56/10076/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB"

The storage capacity of the Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB

The "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB

The "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" or "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 192GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB

Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos67/10090/100

Which to buy, the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" or "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" or "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" is a great choice. If you want a larger screen, "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" is recommended as it has a 6.0inch screen. The "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" and "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" overall, "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.

Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB

Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB

Handling50/10065/100
Display62/10056/100
CPU specs28/10048/100
General rating56/10062/100

Is it recommended to buy the Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Plum Phantom (2017) 16GB" and "Nokia 3 (2017) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Plum Phantom (2017) 16GBNokia 3 (2017) 16GB
Plum Phantom (2017) 16GBNokia 3 (2017) 16GB
ColorGray/Gold/Rose Gold/WhiteSilver White/Matte Black/Tempered Blue/Copper White
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)84.2mm x 165.5mm x 8.8mm71.4mm x 143.4mm x 8.5mm
Weight138.0g140.0g
Display size6.0inch5.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280720 x 1280
Pixel density244ppi293ppi
Battery capacity2500.0mAh2630.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6580AMediatek MT6737
CPU specs1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size1.0GB2.0GB
Storage size16.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles