Plum Sync 3.5 512MB vs Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB: Which is the best?
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:39:16, Updated date: 2020-04-16 20:06:44
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" and the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" or "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" and the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB"
The design of Plum Sync 3.5 512MB
The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" is 118.4mm long, 56.2mm wide, and 9.8mm thick. It weighs 93.0g.
The design of Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB
The "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" is 144.0mm long, 70.5mm wide, and 8.3mm thick. It weighs 146.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 25.5mm in length, 14.2mm in width, and 1.5mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" for portability.
The difference in weight is 53g. The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Plum Sync 3.5 512MB | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 88/100 | 71/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 100/100 | 56/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 77/100 | 64/100 |
Compare the display of the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB"
Display of the Plum Sync 3.5 512MB
The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 320 x 480, and the pixel density is 164ppi. The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" has a 3.5inch screen size.
Display of the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB
The "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. Neither the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" nor the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Plum Sync 3.5 512MB | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 25/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 15/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB"
Camera performance of Plum Sync 3.5 512MB
The main camera of the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" has 3.0MP. The front camera has 3.0MP.
Camera performance of Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB
The main camera of the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 10MP difference in comparison. The "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 5MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Plum Sync 3.5 512MB | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 25/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 55/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB"
The processing capability of the Plum Sync 3.5 512MB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" uses the Mediatek MT6572M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 256.0MB.
The processing capability of the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" uses the Mediatek MT6582 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB", the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 255MB difference in memory capacity. The "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" has more memory storage, making the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB". The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
There is basically no difference between "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" as it has better performance. Neither the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" nor the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Plum Sync 3.5 512MB | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 27/100 | 47/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 4/100 | 12/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB"
Battery performance of Plum Sync 3.5 512MB
The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" has a battery capacity of 1350.0mAh.
Battery performance of Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB
The "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" has a battery capacity of 1900.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 550mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" and the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB".
If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices.
Plum Sync 3.5 512MB | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 61/100 | 60/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 38/100 | 37/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB"
The storage capacity of the Plum Sync 3.5 512MB
The "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" has 512.0MB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB
The "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 504MB. The "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" unfortunately falls behind here. Neither the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" nor the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 8GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" or "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB".
Plum Sync 3.5 512MB | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 2/100 | 35/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 54/100 | 56/100 |
Which to buy, the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" or "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" or "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.0inch makes the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" a lot easier to use. The "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" and the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB", the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" is overall the clear winner.
Plum Sync 3.5 512MB | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 88/100 | 64/100 |
Display | 18/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 15/100 | 28/100 |
General rating | 38/100 | 51/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Plum Sync 3.5 512MB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" looks compact, and is quite excellent in its ease of being held. It is recommended if you are looking for a device that can be easily operated and held with one hand. The screen size is smaller than that of standard smartphones. The font size on the screen is also rather small, so it is not suited for reading articles or long texts on the internet. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. When looking at its overall specs, the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.
Is it recommended to buy the Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
What are the spec differences between the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Plum Sync 3.5 512MB" and "Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Plum Sync 3.5 512MB | Gigabyte GSmart Mika M3 8GB | |
Color | Black/White/Red/Blue/Pink | Navy Blue |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 56.2mm x 118.4mm x 9.8mm | 70.5mm x 144.0mm x 8.3mm |
Weight | 93.0g | 146.0g |
Display size | 3.5inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | TFT | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 320 x 480 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 164ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 1350.0mAh | 1900.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6572M | Mediatek MT6582 |
CPU specs | 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 256.0MB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 512.0MB | 8.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 3.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 3.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |