Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

A comparive review of the differences between the NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB and Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB. We covered a wide range of variables

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:40:11, Updated date: 2021-10-20 16:05:03

Philips W6610 (2014) 4GBNIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB
Philips W6610 (2014) 4GBNIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" and "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" and "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB".

Philips W6610 (2014) 4GBNIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB
Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB

NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.4
48/100
rating-image2.9
58/100
Screen qualityrating-image2.5
50/100
rating-image3.1
61/100
Performancerating-image1.4
28/100
rating-image1.2
24/100
Storage sizerating-image1
17/100
rating-image1
17/100
Batteryrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image4.4
87/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image2.5
50/100
rating-image2.5
50/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image2.5
50/100
rating-image2.8
55/100

What is the difference between the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" and the "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" and "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB"

The design of Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB

The "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" is 145.4mm long, 74.1mm wide, and 11.4mm thick. It weighs 200.0g.

The design of NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB

The "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" is 154.5mm long, 79.0mm wide, and 9.2mm thick. It weighs 128.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 9mm in length, 4.9mm in width, and 2.2mm in thickness. "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" and "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB". Both the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" and "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 72g. The "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB

NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB

Ease of holding it in one hand59/10054/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand19/10071/100
Ease of carrying around57/10054/100

Compare the display of the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" and "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB"

Display of the Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB

The "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 540 x 960, and the pixel density is 220ppi. The "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Display of the NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB

The "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" nor the "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB

NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?68/10072/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?60/10073/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" and "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB"

Camera performance of Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB

The main camera of the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.

Camera performance of NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB

The main camera of the "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 3.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" and "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones.

There is a 1MP difference in front camera pixel number. When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" and "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.

Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB

NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?50/10050/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?50/10055/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" and "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB"

The processing capability of the Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB

The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.

The processing capability of the NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" uses the Mediatek MT6582M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.

Which has the better processing capability?

The CPU specs are the same for both phones. This is a 511GB difference in memory capacity. The "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" has more memory storage, making the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" and the "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" are not large at all. For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" and the "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" equally.

There is basically no difference between "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" and "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used. Neither the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" nor the "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB

NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet47/10047/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games12/1007/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" and "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB"

Battery performance of Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB

The "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" has a battery capacity of 5300.0mAh.

Battery performance of NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB

The "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2300mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" over the "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB". Both the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" and the "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" and the "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB

NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10087/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10074/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" and "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB"

The storage capacity of the Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB

The "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB

The "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" or "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy. Neither the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" nor the "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 32GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content.

Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB

NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games17/10017/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos55/10065/100

Which to buy, the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" or "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" or "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB"?

"NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" a lot easier to use. There isn't much difference between "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" and "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.

Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB

NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB

Handling48/10058/100
Display50/10061/100
CPU specs28/10024/100
General rating50/10050/100

Is it recommended to buy the Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

Is it recommended to buy the NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" is a mid-range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" and "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Philips W6610 (2014) 4GB" and "NIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Philips W6610 (2014) 4GBNIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB
Philips W6610 (2014) 4GBNIU Andy C5.5E2I 4GB
ColorBlackBlue/Gun Metal
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)74.1mm x 145.4mm x 11.4mm79.0mm x 154.5mm x 9.2mm
Weight200.0g128.0g
Display size5.0inch5.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)540 x 960720 x 1280
Pixel density220ppi267ppi
Battery capacity5300.0mAh3000.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6582M
CPU specs1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size1.0GB512.0MB
Storage size4.0GB4.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution2.0MP3.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles