Which one is better, the HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB or Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:15:58, Updated date: 2021-10-20 14:48:05
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and the "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" or "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and the "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB"
The design of Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB
The "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" is 147.7mm long, 68.7mm wide, and 8.5mm thick. It weighs 163.0g.
The design of HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB
The "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" is 158.5mm long, 74.9mm wide, and 8.5mm thick. It weighs 188.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
"Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. Flick typing is easier on the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" is more compact than "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 25g. The "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 72/100 | 63/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 44/100 | 27/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 65/100 | 59/100 |
Compare the display of the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB"
Display of the Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB
The "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 2960, and the pixel density is 567ppi. The "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" has a 5.8inch screen size.
Display of the HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB
The "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" uses a Super LCD6 liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 2880, and the pixel density is 536ppi. The "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" has a 6.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and the "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and the "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Both the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and the "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 74/100 | 76/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 76/100 | 78/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB"
Camera performance of Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB
The main camera of the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" has 12.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB
The main camera of the "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" has 12.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and the "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.
Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 70/100 | 70/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB"
The processing capability of the Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" uses the Exynos 9810 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
The processing capability of the HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.45GHz+1.9GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 6.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
"HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" has a slightly better CPU performance and better specs overall. This is a 2GB difference in memory capacity. The memory of "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" is slightly larger, so "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" is recommended over "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" for multitasking.
For using fundamental features such as calls, emails, messages and using SNS, I am more inclined to recommend the "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB". For people who mainly use their phones to look things up online, watch videos and play games occasionally I can recommend the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and the "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" equally. Both the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and the "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is basically no difference between "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" when playing 2D games or basic 3D games. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used. Both the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and the "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 94/100 | 100/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 89/100 | 94/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB"
Battery performance of Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB
The "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Battery performance of HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB
The "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" has a battery capacity of 3930.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 930mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" over the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB". Both the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and the "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and the "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 91/100 | 100/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 80/100 | 99/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB"
The storage capacity of the Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB
The "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 1024.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB
The "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" has 128.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 1024.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 128GB. If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" or "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy. Both the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and the "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 128GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" or "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB". Both the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and the "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 90/100 | 90/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 96/100 | 96/100 |
Which to buy, the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" or "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" or "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" is a great choice. If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB". There isn't much difference between "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 63/100 | 52/100 |
Display | 87/100 | 88/100 |
CPU specs | 91/100 | 96/100 |
General rating | 81/100 | 83/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB" and "HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Samsung Galaxy S9 256GB | HTC U11+ (2017) 128GB | |
Color | Midnight Black/Coral Blue/Titanium Gray/Lilac Purple/Burgundy Red/Sunrise Gold/Ice Blue | Translucent Black/Ceramic Black/Amazing Silver |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 68.7mm x 147.7mm x 8.5mm | 74.9mm x 158.5mm x 8.5mm |
Weight | 163.0g | 188.0g |
Display size | 5.8inch | 6.0inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | Super LCD6 |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1440 x 2960 | 1440 x 2880 |
Pixel density | 567ppi | 536ppi |
Battery capacity | 3000.0mAh | 3930.0mAh |
Chipset | Exynos 9810 | Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 |
CPU specs | 2.7GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.45GHz+1.9GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 6.0GB |
Storage size | 256.0GB | 128.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 12.0MP | 12.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |