Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB vs AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:44:15, Updated date: 2020-04-16 15:35:58

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GBAQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB
Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GBAQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB".

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GBAQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB
Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

General rating:
Griprating-image3.5
70/100
rating-image2.9
58/100
Screen qualityrating-image2.7
53/100
rating-image3.7
74/100
Performancerating-image3.2
64/100
rating-image2.8
56/100
Storage sizerating-image3.5
70/100
rating-image3.9
78/100
Batteryrating-image4.3
85/100
rating-image4.3
86/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image3.6
72/100
rating-image3.6
72/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image4.0
80/100
rating-image2.5
50/100

What is the difference between the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB"

The design of Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is 135.4mm long, 66.2mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 138.0g.

The design of AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

The "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" is 140.0mm long, 74.0mm wide, and 9.3mm thick. It weighs 154.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 4.5mm in length, 7.7mm in width, and 1.4mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is more compact than "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 16g. The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

Ease of holding it in one hand76/10064/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand63/10050/100
Ease of carrying around68/10059/100

Compare the display of the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB"

Display of the Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 312ppi. The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" has a 4.7inch screen size.

Display of the AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

The "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" uses a IGZO liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 407ppi. The "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" has a 5.4inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.7inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. The "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB".

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?63/10071/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?48/10072/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB"

Camera performance of Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

The main camera of the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

The main camera of the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" has 13.1MP. The front camera has 2.1MP.

Which camera performance is better?

There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is a 5.9MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/10050/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB"

The processing capability of the Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" uses the Exynos 7870 Octa SoC. The CPU performance is 1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

The processing capability of the AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" uses the MSM8974AB SoC. The CPU performance is 2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB", the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" are not large at all. Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB". The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" as it has better performance.

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet80/10076/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games47/10039/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB"

Battery performance of Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2350.0mAh.

Battery performance of AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

The "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3300.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 950mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB". Both the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices. Both the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet85/10086/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos71/10072/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB"

The storage capacity of the Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

The "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 112GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. Both the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/10078/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos90/10078/100

Which to buy, the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" or "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" or "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.4inch makes the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" a lot easier to use. "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is better for users who prefer better functionality and specs. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB

Handling70/10058/100
Display53/10074/100
CPU specs64/10056/100
General rating66/10067/100

Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and "AQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GBAQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB
Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GBAQUOS ZETA SH-04F docomo 32GB
ColorBlack Sky/Gold Sand/Blue Mist/Peach CloudOrange/Black/White
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)66.2mm x 135.4mm x 7.9mm74.0mm x 140.0mm x 9.3mm
Weight138.0g154.0g
Display size4.7inch5.4inch
Display typeSuper AMOLEDIGZO
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 12801080 x 1920
Pixel density312ppi407ppi
Battery capacity2350.0mAh3300.0mAh
ChipsetExynos 7870 OctaMSM8974AB
CPU specs1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores)2.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB2.0GB
Storage size16.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP13.1MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP2.1MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles