Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which one is better, the Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB or Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:50:45, Updated date: 2020-04-16 19:02:13

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GBMotorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB
Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GBMotorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB".

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GBMotorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB
Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB

General rating:
Griprating-image3.5
70/100
rating-image3.1
61/100
Screen qualityrating-image2.7
53/100
rating-image3.7
74/100
Performancerating-image3.2
64/100
rating-image2.9
58/100
Storage sizerating-image3.5
70/100
rating-image4.2
84/100
Batteryrating-image4.3
85/100
rating-image3.6
71/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image3.6
72/100
rating-image3.6
72/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image4.0
80/100
rating-image2.5
50/100

What is the difference between the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and the "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB"

The design of Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is 135.4mm long, 66.2mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 138.0g.

The design of Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB

The "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB" is 140.8mm long, 72.4mm wide, and 10.0mm thick. It weighs 144.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 5.4mm in length, 6.2mm in width, and 2mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is more compact than "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 6g. There is very little difference in weight between the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB

Ease of holding it in one hand76/10065/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand63/10058/100
Ease of carrying around68/10060/100

Compare the display of the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB"

Display of the Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 312ppi. The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" has a 4.7inch screen size.

Display of the Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB

The "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB" uses a AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 423ppi. The "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. The "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB". The "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?63/10070/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?48/10070/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB"

Camera performance of Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

The main camera of the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB

The main camera of the "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and the "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is a 6MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/10050/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB"

The processing capability of the Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" uses the Exynos 7870 Octa SoC. The CPU performance is 1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

The processing capability of the Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8974AC Snapdragon 801 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.5GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB", the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and the "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB" are not large at all. For people who mostly use their phone to look up things on the internet, watch videos, or occasionally play mini games, the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" edges out the competition. The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" as it has better performance.

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet80/10076/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games47/10040/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB"

Battery performance of Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2350.0mAh.

Battery performance of Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB

The "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 2300.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 50mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" over the "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB". Both the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and the "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet85/10071/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos71/10047/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB"

The storage capacity of the Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB

The "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 48GB. The "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/10084/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos90/100 -

Which to buy, the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" or "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" or "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB"?

"Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.2inch makes the "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB" a lot easier to use. "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is better for users who prefer better functionality and specs. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB

Handling70/10061/100
Display53/10074/100
CPU specs64/10058/100
General rating66/10063/100

Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" and "Motorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GBMotorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB
Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GBMotorola Moto X (2nd Gen) 64GB
ColorBlack Sky/Gold Sand/Blue Mist/Peach CloudBlack/White
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)66.2mm x 135.4mm x 7.9mm72.4mm x 140.8mm x 10.0mm
Weight138.0g144.0g
Display size4.7inch5.2inch
Display typeSuper AMOLEDAMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 12801080 x 1920
Pixel density312ppi423ppi
Battery capacity2350.0mAh2300.0mAh
ChipsetExynos 7870 OctaQualcomm MSM8974AC Snapdragon 801
CPU specs1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores)2.5GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB2.0GB
Storage size16.0GB64.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP2.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles