Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB and iPhone 7 Plus 256GB review
Created date: 2018-09-30 21:21:17, Updated date: 2021-10-20 16:36:00
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB".
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | iPhone 7 Plus 256GB | |||
General rating: | 63.2/100 (The 1195th of all smartphones) | 61.9/100 (The 258th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 42/100 | 50/100 | ||
Screen quality | 74/100 | 74/100 | ||
Performance | 82/100 | 63/100 | ||
Storage size | 78/100 | 90/100 | ||
Battery | 100/100 | 85/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 80/100 | 70/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 80/100 | 75/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and the "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" or "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and the "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB"
The design of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is 161.7mm long, 80.9mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 210.0g.
The design of iPhone 7 Plus 256GB
The "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" is 158.2mm long, 77.9mm wide, and 7.3mm thick. It weighs 188.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 3.5mm in length, 3mm in width, and 0.6mm in thickness. "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" is bigger than "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 22g. The "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | iPhone 7 Plus 256GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 52/100 | 60/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 12/100 | 27/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 54/100 | 57/100 |
Compare the display of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB"
Display of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 367ppi. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a 6.0inch screen size.
Display of the iPhone 7 Plus 256GB
The "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" uses a Retina IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 400ppi. The "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. When you actually look at the screen, "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" feels like it has a slightly bigger display. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and the "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" makes it more suited for playing games. Both the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and the "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB".
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | iPhone 7 Plus 256GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 76/100 | 72/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 78/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB"
Camera performance of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The main camera of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of iPhone 7 Plus 256GB
The main camera of the "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" has 12.0MP. The front camera has 7.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 4MP difference in comparison. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and the "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 1MP difference in front camera pixel number. When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | iPhone 7 Plus 256GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 80/100 | 70/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | 75/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB"
The processing capability of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
The processing capability of the iPhone 7 Plus 256GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" uses the Apple A10 Fusion SoC. The CPU performance is 2.34GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB", the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" than the "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB". The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | iPhone 7 Plus 256GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 85/100 | 77/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 79/100 | 51/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB"
Battery performance of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.
Battery performance of iPhone 7 Plus 256GB
The "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" has a battery capacity of 2900.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2100mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" over the "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB". Both the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and the "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and the "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | iPhone 7 Plus 256GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 85/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 70/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB"
The storage capacity of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the iPhone 7 Plus 256GB
The "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" has 256.0GB of internal memory.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 224GB. The "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | iPhone 7 Plus 256GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 78/100 | 90/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 90/100 | - |
Which to buy, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" or "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" or "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB"?
"iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB". The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" overall, "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | iPhone 7 Plus 256GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 42/100 | 50/100 |
Display | 74/100 | 74/100 |
CPU specs | 82/100 | 63/100 |
General rating | 75/100 | 66/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the iPhone 7 Plus 256GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "iPhone 7 Plus 256GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | iPhone 7 Plus 256GB | |
Color | White/Black/Gold | Jet Black/Black/Silver/Gold/Rose Gold/Red |
OS | Android | iOS |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 80.9mm x 161.7mm x 7.9mm | 77.9mm x 158.2mm x 7.3mm |
Weight | 210.0g | 188.0g |
Display size | 6.0inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | Retina IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 367ppi | 400ppi |
Battery capacity | 5000.0mAh | 2900.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 | Apple A10 Fusion |
CPU specs | 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.34GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 256.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 12.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 7.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |