Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB vs Lava A67 (2016) 4GB: Which is the best?
Created date: 2018-09-30 21:20:48, Updated date: 2021-10-20 19:21:54
How are the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | Lava A67 (2016) 4GB | |||
General rating: | 63.2/100 (The 1195th of all smartphones) | 35.5/100 (The 1849th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 42/100 | 61/100 | ||
Screen quality | 74/100 | 48/100 | ||
Performance | 82/100 | 24/100 | ||
Storage size | 78/100 | 17/100 | ||
Battery | 100/100 | 72/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 80/100 | 35/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 80/100 | 50/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and the "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" or "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and the "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB"
The design of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is 161.7mm long, 80.9mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 210.0g.
The design of Lava A67 (2016) 4GB
The "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB" is 145.5mm long, 72.0mm wide, and 9.2mm thick. It weighs 152.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 16.1mm in length, 8.9mm in width, and 1.2mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB" is more compact than "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 58g. The "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | Lava A67 (2016) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 52/100 | 68/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 12/100 | 51/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 54/100 | 62/100 |
Compare the display of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB"
Display of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 367ppi. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a 6.0inch screen size.
Display of the Lava A67 (2016) 4GB
The "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 195ppi. The "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB". The "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | Lava A67 (2016) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 76/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 78/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB"
Camera performance of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The main camera of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of Lava A67 (2016) 4GB
The main camera of the "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 11MP difference in comparison. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 6MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | Lava A67 (2016) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 80/100 | 35/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | 50/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB"
The processing capability of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
The processing capability of the Lava A67 (2016) 4GB
The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB", the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 508GB difference in memory capacity. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" than the "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB". The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | Lava A67 (2016) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 85/100 | 47/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 79/100 | 7/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB"
Battery performance of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.
Battery performance of Lava A67 (2016) 4GB
The "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 3000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" over the "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB". Both the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and the "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | Lava A67 (2016) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 100/100 | 72/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 100/100 | 49/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB"
The storage capacity of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB
The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Lava A67 (2016) 4GB
The "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 28GB. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 252GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | Lava A67 (2016) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 78/100 | 17/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 90/100 | 55/100 |
Which to buy, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" or "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" or "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.0inch makes the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and the "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB", the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is overall the clear winner.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | Lava A67 (2016) 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 42/100 | 61/100 |
Display | 74/100 | 48/100 |
CPU specs | 82/100 | 24/100 |
General rating | 75/100 | 43/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Is it recommended to buy the Lava A67 (2016) 4GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
What are the spec differences between the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Lava A67 (2016) 4GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB | Lava A67 (2016) 4GB | |
Color | White/Black/Gold | White/Gold/Gray |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 80.9mm x 161.7mm x 7.9mm | 72.0mm x 145.5mm x 9.2mm |
Weight | 210.0g | 152.0g |
Display size | 6.0inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | 480 x 854 |
Pixel density | 367ppi | 195ppi |
Battery capacity | 5000.0mAh | 2000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 | |
CPU specs | 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 512.0MB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 4.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 5.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 2.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |