Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB vs Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB: Full Comparison!

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:59:14, Updated date: 2021-10-20 17:55:36

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GBGalaxy A3 (2017) 16GB
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GBGalaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB".

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GBGalaxy A3 (2017) 16GB
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.1
42/100
rating-image3.5
70/100
Screen qualityrating-image3.7
74/100
rating-image2.7
53/100
Performancerating-image4.1
82/100
rating-image3.2
64/100
Storage sizerating-image3.9
78/100
rating-image3.5
70/100
Batteryrating-image5.0
100/100
rating-image4.3
85/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image4.0
80/100
rating-image3.6
72/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image4.0
80/100
rating-image4.0
80/100

What is the difference between the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB"

The design of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is 161.7mm long, 80.9mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 210.0g.

The design of Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is 135.4mm long, 66.2mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 138.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" for portability.

The difference in weight is 72g. The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand52/10076/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand12/10063/100
Ease of carrying around54/10068/100

Compare the display of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB"

Display of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 367ppi. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a 6.0inch screen size.

Display of the Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 312ppi. The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" has a 4.7inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 1.2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB".

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?76/10063/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?78/10048/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB"

Camera performance of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

The main camera of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

The main camera of the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. As for taking photos of scenic places or group photos of people, the rear camera of "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is more suited for capturing distant objects. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?80/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/10080/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB"

The processing capability of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.

The processing capability of the Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" uses the Exynos 7870 Octa SoC. The CPU performance is 1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

"Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a slightly better CPU performance and better specs overall. This is a 2GB difference in memory capacity. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For using fundamental features such as calls, emails, messages and using SNS, I am more inclined to recommend the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB". Both the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" than the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB". The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet85/10080/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games79/10047/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB"

Battery performance of Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2350.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2650mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" over the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB". Both the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10085/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10071/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB"

The storage capacity of the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

The "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 16GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" or "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB". Both the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games78/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos90/10090/100

Which to buy, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" or "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" or "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 6.0inch makes the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" overall, "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB

Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB

Handling42/10070/100
Display74/10053/100
CPU specs82/10064/100
General rating75/10066/100

Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GB" and "Galaxy A3 (2017) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GBGalaxy A3 (2017) 16GB
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) 32GBGalaxy A3 (2017) 16GB
ColorWhite/Black/GoldBlack Sky/Gold Sand/Blue Mist/Peach Cloud
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)80.9mm x 161.7mm x 7.9mm66.2mm x 135.4mm x 7.9mm
Weight210.0g138.0g
Display size6.0inch4.7inch
Display typeSuper AMOLEDSuper AMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 1920720 x 1280
Pixel density367ppi312ppi
Battery capacity5000.0mAh2350.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652Exynos 7870 Octa
CPU specs1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size4.0GB2.0GB
Storage size32.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution16.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles