Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB vs MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB: Full Comparison!
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:49:48, Updated date: 2020-04-15 13:50:38
How are the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB | MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | |||
General rating: | 72.1/100 (The 1032th of all smartphones) | 44.5/100 (The 702th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 64/100 | 69/100 | ||
Screen quality | 76/100 | 56/100 | ||
Performance | 96/100 | 27/100 | ||
Storage size | 84/100 | 35/100 | ||
Battery | 94/100 | 75/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 80/100 | 50/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 100/100 | 50/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" or "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
The design of Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB
The "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" is 142.7mm long, 73.0mm wide, and 7.8mm thick. It weighs 140.0g.
The design of MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is 142.8mm long, 70.4mm wide, and 8.4mm thick. It weighs 125.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 0.1mm in length, 2.5mm in width, and 0.6mm in thickness. Both the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". Both the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 15g. The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB | MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 69/100 | 71/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 61/100 | 74/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 62/100 | 64/100 |
Compare the display of the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
Display of the Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB
The "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" uses a IGZO IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2040, and the pixel density is 419ppi. The "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Display of the MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" uses a IPS liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". The "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB | MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 72/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 73/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
Camera performance of Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB
The main camera of the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 20.0MP.
Camera performance of MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
The main camera of the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 8MP difference in comparison. The "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 18MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB | MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 80/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 100/100 | 50/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
The processing capability of the Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.2GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 6.0GB.
The processing capability of the MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" uses the Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB", the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 5GB difference in memory capacity. The "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB". The "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" than the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". The "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB | MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 100/100 | 44/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 94/100 | 11/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
Battery performance of Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB
The "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" has a battery capacity of 3020.0mAh.
Battery performance of MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2300.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 720mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" over the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". Both the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB | MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 94/100 | 75/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 86/100 | 54/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
The storage capacity of the Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB
The "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB
The "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 56GB. The "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 248GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB | MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 84/100 | 35/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 91/100 | 66/100 |
Which to buy, the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" or "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" or "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" a lot easier to use. The "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" and the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB", the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" is overall the clear winner.
Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB | MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 64/100 | 69/100 |
Display | 76/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 96/100 | 27/100 |
General rating | 83/100 | 50/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" is a high-end smart phone.
Is it recommended to buy the MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
What are the spec differences between the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB" and "MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Sharp AQUOSS3 mini 64GB | MADOSMA Q501A-WH 8GB | |
Color | Black/Blue/Gold | |
OS | Android | Windows |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 73.0mm x 142.7mm x 7.8mm | 70.4mm x 142.8mm x 8.4mm |
Weight | 140.0g | 125.0g |
Display size | 5.5inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | IGZO IPS LCD | IPS |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 2040 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 419ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 3020.0mAh | 2300.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 | Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 |
CPU specs | 2.2GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 6.0GB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 8.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 16.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 20.0MP | 2.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |