Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB vs LG K10 (2017) 16GB: Specs & Scores
Created date: 2018-09-30 21:30:59, Updated date: 2021-10-20 21:05:32
How are the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and the "LG K10 (2017) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "LG K10 (2017) 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "LG K10 (2017) 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "LG K10 (2017) 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "LG K10 (2017) 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "LG K10 (2017) 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "LG K10 (2017) 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" or "LG K10 (2017) 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and the "LG K10 (2017) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "LG K10 (2017) 16GB"
The design of Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB
The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is 146.0mm long, 79.0mm wide, and 8.7mm thick. It weighs 168.0g.
The design of LG K10 (2017) 16GB
The "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" is 148.7mm long, 75.3mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 144.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 2.6mm in length, 3.7mm in width, and 0.7mm in thickness. "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" is bigger than "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 24g. The "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | LG K10 (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 55/100 | 64/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 40/100 | 58/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 55/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the display of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "LG K10 (2017) 16GB"
Display of the Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB
The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" uses a S-PureLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 386ppi. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has a 5.7inch screen size.
Display of the LG K10 (2017) 16GB
The "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 277ppi. The "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" has a 5.3inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.4inch difference in the display sizes. When you actually look at the screen, "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" feels like it has a slightly bigger display. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and the "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and the "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "LG K10 (2017) 16GB". The "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | LG K10 (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 73/100 | 70/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 75/100 | 71/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "LG K10 (2017) 16GB"
Camera performance of Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB
The main camera of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 1.0MP.
Camera performance of LG K10 (2017) 16GB
The main camera of the "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and the "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 4MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "LG K10 (2017) 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "LG K10 (2017) 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | LG K10 (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 45/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "LG K10 (2017) 16GB"
The processing capability of the Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
The processing capability of the LG K10 (2017) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6750 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "LG K10 (2017) 16GB", the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "LG K10 (2017) 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB". The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" than the "LG K10 (2017) 16GB".
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | LG K10 (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 84/100 | 74/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 68/100 | 37/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "LG K10 (2017) 16GB"
Battery performance of Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB
The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Battery performance of LG K10 (2017) 16GB
The "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 2800.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 200mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For average daily use, for example looking things up online, SNS, gaming or occasionally checking your screen I can recommend the "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" slightly more. Both the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and the "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | LG K10 (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 82/100 | 89/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 65/100 | 76/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "LG K10 (2017) 16GB"
The storage capacity of the Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB
The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the LG K10 (2017) 16GB
The "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 208GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | LG K10 (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 78/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 90/100 | 67/100 |
Which to buy, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" or "LG K10 (2017) 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" or "LG K10 (2017) 16GB"?
"LG K10 (2017) 16GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.7inch makes the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" overall, "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | LG K10 (2017) 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 51/100 | 60/100 |
Display | 74/100 | 60/100 |
CPU specs | 76/100 | 54/100 |
General rating | 68/100 | 63/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the LG K10 (2017) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "LG K10 (2017) 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "LG K10 (2017) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | LG K10 (2017) 16GB | |
Color | Black/White/Red | Black/Gold/Titan |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 79.0mm x 146.0mm x 8.7mm | 75.3mm x 148.7mm x 7.9mm |
Weight | 168.0g | 144.0g |
Display size | 5.7inch | 5.3inch |
Display type | S-PureLED | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 386ppi | 277ppi |
Battery capacity | 3000.0mAh | 2800.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 | Mediatek MT6750 |
CPU specs | 2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.5GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 1.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |