Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB and Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB review
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:10:17, Updated date: 2021-10-20 22:44:50
How are the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB | |||
General rating: | 56.4/100 (The 1364th of all smartphones) | 56.5/100 (The 1361th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 51/100 | 57/100 | ||
Screen quality | 74/100 | 60/100 | ||
Performance | 76/100 | 80/100 | ||
Storage size | 78/100 | 78/100 | ||
Battery | 82/100 | 100/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 72/100 | 72/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 45/100 | 80/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and the "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" or "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and the "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB"
The design of Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB
The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is 146.0mm long, 79.0mm wide, and 8.7mm thick. It weighs 168.0g.
The design of Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB
The "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" is 147.9mm long, 73.7mm wide, and 8.6mm thick. It weighs 165.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" easier to use and carry around. "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" is bigger than "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Also, "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" is more compact than "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 3g. There is very little difference in weight between the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 55/100 | 66/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 40/100 | 42/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 55/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the display of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB"
Display of the Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB
The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" uses a S-PureLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 386ppi. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has a 5.7inch screen size.
Display of the Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB
The "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 282ppi. The "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. When you actually look at the screen, "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" feels like it has a slightly bigger display. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and the "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" makes it more suited for playing games. Both the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and the "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB". The "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 73/100 | 70/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 75/100 | 70/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB"
Camera performance of Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB
The main camera of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 1.0MP.
Camera performance of Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB
The main camera of the "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and the "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 7MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 45/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB"
The processing capability of the Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
The processing capability of the Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6757 Helio P20 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.35GHz+1.65GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
The CPU specs are the same for both phones. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.
For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and the "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" are not large at all. For people who mostly use their phone to look up things on the internet, watch videos, or occasionally play mini games, the "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" edges out the competition. Both the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and the "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. Functionality is about the same for full-scale 3D games, no matter which phone model is used. The "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 84/100 | 87/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 68/100 | 71/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB"
Battery performance of Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB
The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Battery performance of Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB
The "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" over the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB". Both the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and the "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 82/100 | 100/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 65/100 | 100/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB"
The storage capacity of the Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB
The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB
The "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" or "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 128GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. Both the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and the "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 78/100 | 78/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 90/100 | 78/100 |
Which to buy, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" or "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" or "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB"?
"Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.7inch makes the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" a lot easier to use. There isn't much difference between "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" in terms of performance or specifications. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 51/100 | 57/100 |
Display | 74/100 | 60/100 |
CPU specs | 76/100 | 80/100 |
General rating | 68/100 | 73/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | Lenovo K8 (2017) 32GB | |
Color | Black/White/Red | Black/White+Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 79.0mm x 146.0mm x 8.7mm | 73.7mm x 147.9mm x 8.6mm |
Weight | 168.0g | 165.0g |
Display size | 5.7inch | 5.2inch |
Display type | S-PureLED | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 386ppi | 282ppi |
Battery capacity | 3000.0mAh | 4000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 | Mediatek MT6757 Helio P20 |
CPU specs | 2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 2.35GHz+1.65GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 1.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |