A comparive review of the differences between the QMobile M350 Pro 16GB and Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB. We covered a wide range of variables
Created date: 2018-09-30 23:16:16, Updated date: 2021-10-20 22:50:49
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB".
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | QMobile M350 Pro 16GB | |||
General rating: | 56.4/100 (The 1364th of all smartphones) | 48.9/100 (The 1540th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 51/100 | 57/100 | ||
Screen quality | 74/100 | 56/100 | ||
Performance | 76/100 | 48/100 | ||
Storage size | 78/100 | 70/100 | ||
Battery | 82/100 | 100/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 72/100 | 50/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 45/100 | 65/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and the "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" or "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and the "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB"
The design of Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB
The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is 146.0mm long, 79.0mm wide, and 8.7mm thick. It weighs 168.0g.
The design of QMobile M350 Pro 16GB
The "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB" is 145.5mm long, 71.0mm wide, and 9.4mm thick. It weighs 179.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 0.5mm in length, 8mm in width, and 0.7mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB" is more compact than "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 11g. "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" weighs less than "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB" and is easier to handle.
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | QMobile M350 Pro 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 55/100 | 70/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 40/100 | 33/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 55/100 | 63/100 |
Compare the display of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB"
Display of the Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB
The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" uses a S-PureLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 386ppi. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has a 5.7inch screen size.
Display of the QMobile M350 Pro 16GB
The "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.7inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has a bigger display that is easier to use, especially for looking things up on the Internet and using social media. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB". The "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | QMobile M350 Pro 16GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 73/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 75/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB"
Camera performance of Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB
The main camera of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 1.0MP.
Camera performance of QMobile M350 Pro 16GB
The main camera of the "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 4MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | QMobile M350 Pro 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 45/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB"
The processing capability of the Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
The processing capability of the QMobile M350 Pro 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB" uses the Mediatek MT6580M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB", the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB". The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" than the "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB".
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | QMobile M350 Pro 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 84/100 | 71/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 68/100 | 32/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB"
Battery performance of Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB
The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Battery performance of QMobile M350 Pro 16GB
The "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB" has a battery capacity of 5000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB" over the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB". Both the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and the "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | QMobile M350 Pro 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 82/100 | 100/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 65/100 | 100/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB"
The storage capacity of the Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB
The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the QMobile M350 Pro 16GB
The "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 208GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | QMobile M350 Pro 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 78/100 | 70/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 90/100 | 67/100 |
Which to buy, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" or "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" or "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB"?
"QMobile M350 Pro 16GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.7inch makes the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB" overall, "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | QMobile M350 Pro 16GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 51/100 | 57/100 |
Display | 74/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 76/100 | 48/100 |
General rating | 68/100 | 62/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the QMobile M350 Pro 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB" and "QMobile M350 Pro 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Sharp AQUOSXx (2015) 32GB | QMobile M350 Pro 16GB | |
Color | Black/White/Red | Black/Gold/White |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 79.0mm x 146.0mm x 8.7mm | 71.0mm x 145.5mm x 9.4mm |
Weight | 168.0g | 179.0g |
Display size | 5.7inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | S-PureLED | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 386ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 3000.0mAh | 5000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 | Mediatek MT6580M |
CPU specs | 2.0GHz+1.5GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 2.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 16.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 1.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |