Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Vivo V7 (2017) 32GB vs Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB: Which is the best?

Created date: 2018-09-30 21:56:18, Updated date: 2020-04-16 20:19:20

vivo V7 (2017) 32GBGalaxy A7 (2016) 16GB
vivo V7 (2017) 32GBGalaxy A7 (2016) 16GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB".

vivo V7 (2017) 32GBGalaxy A7 (2016) 16GB
vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB

General rating:
Griprating-image3.2
72.8mm x 149.3mm x 7.9mm
rating-image2.9
74.1mm x 151.5mm x 7.3mm
Screen qualityrating-image3.2
IPS LCD, 5.7inch, 720 x 1440
rating-image3.7
Super AMOLED, 5.5inch, 1080 x 1920
Performancerating-image4.5
Qualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450, 1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores), 4.0GB
rating-image3.5
Exynos 7580 Octa ,Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615, 1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores), 3.0GB
Storage sizerating-image3.9
32.0GB
rating-image3.5
16.0GB
Batteryrating-image4.4
3000.0mAh
rating-image4.5
3300.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image4.0
16.0MP
rating-image3.6
13.0MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
24.0MP
rating-image3.3
5.0MP

What is the difference between the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB"

The design of vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is 149.3mm long, 72.8mm wide, and 7.9mm thick. It weighs 139.0g.

The design of Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB

The "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" is 151.5mm long, 74.1mm wide, and 7.3mm thick. It weighs 172.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 2.1mm in length, 1.2mm in width, and 0.6mm in thickness. Both the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB". Both the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 33g. The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand69/10068/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand62/10038/100
Ease of carrying around62/10062/100

Compare the display of the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB"

Display of the vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1440, and the pixel density is 282ppi. The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has a 5.7inch screen size.

Display of the Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB

The "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 400ppi. The "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB". The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?73/10072/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?75/10073/100

Compare the camera performances of the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB"

Camera performance of vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

The main camera of the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 24.0MP.

Camera performance of Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB

The main camera of the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. As for taking photos of scenic places or group photos of people, the rear camera of "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is more suited for capturing distant objects. The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is a 19MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?80/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?100/10065/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB"

The processing capability of the vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.

The processing capability of the Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" uses the Exynos 7580 Octa ,Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB", the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB". Both the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" than the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB". The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet93/10080/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games88/10058/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB"

Battery performance of vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB

The "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3300.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 300mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB". Both the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices. Both the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet88/10089/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos76/10076/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB"

The storage capacity of the vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB

The "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 16GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" or "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB". Both the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games78/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos90/10090/100

Which to buy, the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" or "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" or "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB"?

"vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" a lot easier to use. The "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" overall, "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.

vivo V7 (2017) 32GB

Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB

Handling64/10057/100
Display63/10074/100
CPU specs90/10069/100
General rating78/10069/100

Is it recommended to buy the vivo V7 (2017) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo V7 (2017) 32GB" and "Galaxy A7 (2016) 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

vivo V7 (2017) 32GBGalaxy A7 (2016) 16GB
vivo V7 (2017) 32GBGalaxy A7 (2016) 16GB
ColorChampagne Gold/Matte Black/Energetic BlueBlack/White/Gold/Pink
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)72.8mm x 149.3mm x 7.9mm74.1mm x 151.5mm x 7.3mm
Weight139.0g172.0g
Display size5.7inch5.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDSuper AMOLED
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 14401080 x 1920
Pixel density282ppi400ppi
Battery capacity3000.0mAh3300.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450Exynos 7580 Octa ,Qualcomm MSM8939 Snapdragon 615
CPU specs1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)1.6GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size4.0GB3.0GB
Storage size32.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution16.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution24.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles