Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Vivo X20 (2017) 64GB and HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB review

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:51:04, Updated date: 2021-10-20 20:00:21

vivo X20 (2017) 64GBHTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB
vivo X20 (2017) 64GBHTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB".

vivo X20 (2017) 64GBHTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB
vivo X20 (2017) 64GB

HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.9
75.2mm x 155.9mm x 7.2mm
rating-image2.5
79.8mm x 162.4mm x 8.0mm
Screen qualityrating-image3.9
Super AMOLED, 6.01inch, 1080 x 2160
rating-image4.2
Super LCD5, 5.7inch, 1440 x 2560
Performancerating-image4.4
Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660, 2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores), 4.0GB
rating-image3.4
Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 821, 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores), 4.0GB
Storage sizerating-image4.2
64.0GB
rating-image4.5
128.0GB
Batteryrating-image4.5
3250.0mAh
rating-image4.4
3000.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image3.5
12.0MP
rating-image3.5
12.0MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image5.0
12.0MP
rating-image5.0
16.0MP

What is the difference between the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"

The design of vivo X20 (2017) 64GB

The "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" is 155.9mm long, 75.2mm wide, and 7.2mm thick. It weighs 159.0g.

The design of HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" is 162.4mm long, 79.8mm wide, and 8.0mm thick. It weighs 170.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 6.5mm in length, 4.5mm in width, and 0.7mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" easier to use and carry around. "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" is bigger than "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Also, "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" is more compact than "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 11g. "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" weighs less than "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" and is easier to handle.

vivo X20 (2017) 64GB

HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

Ease of holding it in one hand65/10054/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand46/10039/100
Ease of carrying around60/10055/100

Compare the display of the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"

Display of the vivo X20 (2017) 64GB

The "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 2160, and the pixel density is 401ppi. The "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" has a 6.01inch screen size.

Display of the HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" uses a Super LCD5 liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 2560, and the pixel density is 515ppi. The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" has a 5.7inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.3inch difference in the display sizes. When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB". The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

vivo X20 (2017) 64GB

HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?76/10073/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?79/10075/100

Compare the camera performances of the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"

Camera performance of vivo X20 (2017) 64GB

The main camera of the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" has 12.0MP. The front camera has 12.0MP.

Camera performance of HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

The main camera of the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" has 12.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is a 4MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. Both the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.

vivo X20 (2017) 64GB

HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?70/10070/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?100/100100/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"

The processing capability of the vivo X20 (2017) 64GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.

The processing capability of the HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 821 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB", the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB". The "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" than the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB". The "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

vivo X20 (2017) 64GB

HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet90/10077/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games85/10060/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"

Battery performance of vivo X20 (2017) 64GB

The "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 3250.0mAh.

Battery performance of HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 250mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB". Both the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices. Both the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

vivo X20 (2017) 64GB

HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet90/10088/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos79/10076/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"

The storage capacity of the vivo X20 (2017) 64GB

The "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

The "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" has 128.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 1024.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 64GB. "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" unfortunately falls behind here. Both the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 832GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" is recommended over "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" if you save a lot of movies to watch on your phone, or if you save a lot of photos. Both the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

vivo X20 (2017) 64GB

HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games84/10090/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos91/10096/100

Which to buy, the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" or "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" or "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB"?

"vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. If you want a larger screen, "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" is recommended as it has a 5.7inch screen. The "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.

vivo X20 (2017) 64GB

HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB

Handling58/10050/100
Display77/10084/100
CPU specs88/10067/100
General rating78/10076/100

Is it recommended to buy the vivo X20 (2017) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo X20 (2017) 64GB" and "HTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

vivo X20 (2017) 64GBHTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB
vivo X20 (2017) 64GBHTC U Ultra (2017) 128GB
ColorMatte Black/Black+Gold/Gold/Rose gold/Blue/PinkBrilliant Black/Cosmetic Pink/Ice White/Sapphire Blue
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)75.2mm x 155.9mm x 7.2mm79.8mm x 162.4mm x 8.0mm
Weight159.0g170.0g
Display size6.01inch5.7inch
Display typeSuper AMOLEDSuper LCD5
Screen resolution (width x height)1080 x 21601440 x 2560
Pixel density401ppi515ppi
Battery capacity3250.0mAh3000.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 821
CPU specs2.2GHz+1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size4.0GB4.0GB
Storage size64.0GB128.0GB
Rear-camera resolution12.0MP12.0MP
Front-camera resolution12.0MP16.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles