Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which one is better, the Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB or vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:46:27, Updated date: 2020-04-16 15:54:51

vivo V7+ (2017) 64GBSamsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB
vivo V7+ (2017) 64GBSamsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB".

vivo V7+ (2017) 64GBSamsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB
vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB

Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB

General rating:

67.4/100

(The 1106th of all smartphones)

53.8/100

(The 1422th of all smartphones)

Grip
57/100
54/100
Screen quality
64/100
61/100
Performance
90/100
74/100
Storage size
84/100
70/100
Battery
90/100
96/100
Rear-camera resolution
80/100
50/100
Front-camera resolution
100/100
65/100

What is the difference between the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB"

The design of vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB

The "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" is 155.9mm long, 75.8mm wide, and 7.7mm thick. It weighs 160.0g.

The design of Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB

The "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB" is 151.4mm long, 76.2mm wide, and 8.6mm thick. It weighs 167.3g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 4.5mm in length, 0.4mm in width, and 0.8mm in thickness. Both the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB". Both the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 7.3g. There is very little difference in weight between the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.

vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB

Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB

Ease of holding it in one hand63/10061/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand46/10041/100
Ease of carrying around59/10058/100

Compare the display of the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB"

Display of the vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB

The "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1440, and the pixel density is 268ppi. The "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" has a 5.99inch screen size.

Display of the Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB

The "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.49inch difference in the display sizes. When you actually look at the screen, "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" feels like it has a slightly bigger display. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. If you compare how well the different phones support mobile games, the display size of "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" makes it more suited for playing games. Both the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" nor the "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB

Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?76/10072/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?78/10073/100

Compare the camera performances of the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB"

Camera performance of vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB

The main camera of the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 24.0MP.

Camera performance of Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB

The main camera of the "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 8MP difference in comparison. The "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 19MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB

Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?80/10050/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?100/10065/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB"

The processing capability of the vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" uses the Qualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.

The processing capability of the Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8953 Snapdragon 625 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.2GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB", the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 2GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB". For people who mostly use their phone to look up things on the internet, watch videos, or occasionally play mini games, the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" edges out the competition. Both the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" than the "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB". The "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB

Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet93/10086/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games88/10060/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB"

Battery performance of vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB

The "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 3225.0mAh.

Battery performance of Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB

The "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3300.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 75mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For average daily use, for example looking things up online, SNS, gaming or occasionally checking your screen I can recommend the "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB" slightly more. Both the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB

Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet90/10096/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos78/10089/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB"

The storage capacity of the vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB

The "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB

The "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 48GB. The "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 48GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" or "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB". Both the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB

Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games84/10070/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos91/10090/100

Which to buy, the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" or "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" or "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB"?

When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB". If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB". The "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" and the "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB", the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" is overall the clear winner.

vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB

Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB

Handling57/10054/100
Display64/10061/100
CPU specs90/10074/100
General rating78/10066/100

Is it recommended to buy the vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo V7+ (2017) 64GB" and "Samsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

vivo V7+ (2017) 64GBSamsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB
vivo V7+ (2017) 64GBSamsung Galaxy J7 V 16GB
ColorChampagne Gold/Matte Black/Infinite RedGray/Black
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)75.8mm x 155.9mm x 7.7mm76.2mm x 151.4mm x 8.6mm
Weight160.0g167.3g
Display size5.99inch5.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1440720 x 1280
Pixel density268ppi267ppi
Battery capacity3225.0mAh3300.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm SDM450 Snapdragon 450Qualcomm MSM8953 Snapdragon 625
CPU specs1.8GHz×8(8.0-cores)2.2GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size4.0GB2.0GB
Storage size64.0GB16.0GB
Rear-camera resolution16.0MP8.0MP
Front-camera resolution24.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles