Vivo X6S (2016) 64GB vs Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB: Which is the best?
Created date: 2018-09-30 21:19:42, Updated date: 2021-10-20 15:16:22
Which do we recommend after comparing the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" and "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" and "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB".
vivo X6S (2016) 64GB | Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB | |||
General rating: | 62.5/100 (The 1209th of all smartphones) | 48.9/100 (The 1541th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 64/100 | 60/100 | ||
Screen quality | 74/100 | 56/100 | ||
Performance | 82/100 | 28/100 | ||
Storage size | 84/100 | 35/100 | ||
Battery | 78/100 | 100/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 72/100 | 50/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 80/100 | 65/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" and the "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" and "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" and "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" and "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" and "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" and "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" and "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" or "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" and "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB" ?
What is the difference between the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" and the "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" and "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB"
The design of vivo X6S (2016) 64GB
The "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" is 147.9mm long, 73.8mm wide, and 6.7mm thick. It weighs 140.5g.
The design of Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB
The "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB" is 143.5mm long, 71.3mm wide, and 9.3mm thick. It weighs 161.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 4.4mm in length, 2.5mm in width, and 2.6mm in thickness. Both the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" and "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" and "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB". Both the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" and "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 20.5g. The "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
vivo X6S (2016) 64GB | Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 69/100 | 69/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 61/100 | 45/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 62/100 | 62/100 |
Compare the display of the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" and "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB"
Display of the vivo X6S (2016) 64GB
The "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" uses a Super AMOLED liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 423ppi. The "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.
Display of the Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB
The "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB" uses a LTPS IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB". The "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
vivo X6S (2016) 64GB | Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 70/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 70/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" and "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB"
Camera performance of vivo X6S (2016) 64GB
The main camera of the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB
The main camera of the "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
vivo X6S (2016) 64GB | Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 50/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" and "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB"
The processing capability of the vivo X6S (2016) 64GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
The processing capability of the Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8909v2 Snapdragon 212 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB", the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 3GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB". The "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" than the "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB". The "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
vivo X6S (2016) 64GB | Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 85/100 | 47/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 79/100 | 12/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" and "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB"
Battery performance of vivo X6S (2016) 64GB
The "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" has a battery capacity of 2400.0mAh.
Battery performance of Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB
The "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB" has a battery capacity of 4100.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1700mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB" over the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB". Both the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" and the "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
vivo X6S (2016) 64GB | Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 78/100 | 100/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 59/100 | 100/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" and "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB"
The storage capacity of the vivo X6S (2016) 64GB
The "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB
The "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 56GB. The "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 184GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. Both the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" and the "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
vivo X6S (2016) 64GB | Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 84/100 | 35/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 91/100 | 75/100 |
Which to buy, the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" or "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" or "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" and "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB". Its perfect screen size of 5.2inch makes the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" a lot easier to use. The "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" and the "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB", the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" is overall the clear winner.
vivo X6S (2016) 64GB | Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 64/100 | 60/100 |
Display | 74/100 | 56/100 |
CPU specs | 82/100 | 28/100 |
General rating | 74/100 | 56/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the vivo X6S (2016) 64GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Is it recommended to buy the Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
What are the spec differences between the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" and "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "vivo X6S (2016) 64GB" and "Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
vivo X6S (2016) 64GB | Nokia 2 (2017) 8GB | |
Color | Silver/Gold/Rose Gold | Pewter+Black/Pewter+White/Copper+Black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 73.8mm x 147.9mm x 6.7mm | 71.3mm x 143.5mm x 9.3mm |
Weight | 140.5g | 161.0g |
Display size | 5.2inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | Super AMOLED | LTPS IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 1080 x 1920 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 423ppi | 293ppi |
Battery capacity | 2400.0mAh | 4100.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 | Qualcomm MSM8909v2 Snapdragon 212 |
CPU specs | 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 4.0GB | 1.0GB |
Storage size | 64.0GB | 8.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 8.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |