Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Compare Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB vs Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:05:04, Updated date: 2020-04-15 17:27:59

Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GBCoolpad Note 3s 32GB
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GBCoolpad Note 3s 32GB

How are the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GBCoolpad Note 3s 32GB
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB

Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.7
77.5mm x 153.5mm x 8.5mm
rating-image2.7
77.4mm x 154.5mm x 8.3mm
Screen qualityrating-image3.1
IPS LCD, 5.5inch, 720 x 1280
rating-image3.1
IPS LCD, 5.5inch, 720 x 1280
Performancerating-image2.8
Cortex-A53, 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores), 3.0GB
rating-image3.2
Qualcomm MSM8929 Snapdragon 415, 1.3GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores), 3.0GB
Storage sizerating-image3.9
32.0GB
rating-image3.9
32.0GB
Batteryrating-image4.5
3000.0mAh
rating-image3.9
2500.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image3.6
13.0MP
rating-image3.6
13.0MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image4.0
8.0MP
rating-image3.3
5.0MP

What is the difference between the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB"

The design of Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB

The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is 153.5mm long, 77.5mm wide, and 8.5mm thick. It weighs 167.0g.

The design of Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" is 154.5mm long, 77.4mm wide, and 8.3mm thick. It weighs 163.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

Both the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB". Both the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 4g. There is very little difference in weight between the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.

Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB

Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

Ease of holding it in one hand58/10059/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand41/10044/100
Ease of carrying around57/10057/100

Compare the display of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB"

Display of the Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB

The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Display of the Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" nor the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB

Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?72/10072/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?73/10073/100

Compare the camera performances of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB"

Camera performance of Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB

The main camera of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Camera performance of Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

The main camera of the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB

Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?80/10065/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB"

The processing capability of the Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" uses the Cortex-A53 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

The processing capability of the Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8929 Snapdragon 415 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. There is very little difference in memory capacity. Both phones are similarly efficient as multitasking tools.

For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" are not large at all. Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB". The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. For playing more memory-intensive 3D games, it is better to go with "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" as it has better performance.

Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB

Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet73/10077/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games45/10051/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB"

Battery performance of Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB

The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you use the phone infrequently for just making calls or checking the time, I think the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is a bit better. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" over the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB". Both the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB

Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet90/10078/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos79/10058/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB"

The storage capacity of the Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB

The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" or "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 96GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB

Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games78/10078/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos78/10065/100

Which to buy, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" or "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" or "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB"?

When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB". If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB". "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" is better for users who prefer better functionality and specs. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.

Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB

Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

Handling53/10054/100
Display61/10061/100
CPU specs56/10064/100
General rating66/10063/100

Is it recommended to buy the Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Coolpad Note 3s 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GBCoolpad Note 3s 32GB
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GBCoolpad Note 3s 32GB
ColorBlack/Gold/Deep Bleen/Cherry RedWhite/Gold
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)77.5mm x 153.5mm x 8.5mm77.4mm x 154.5mm x 8.3mm
Weight167.0g163.0g
Display size5.5inch5.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280720 x 1280
Pixel density267ppi267ppi
Battery capacity3000.0mAh2500.0mAh
ChipsetCortex-A53Qualcomm MSM8929 Snapdragon 415
CPU specs1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.3GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB3.0GB
Storage size32.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution8.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles