Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB vs LG G5 (2016) 32GB: Which is the best?
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:13:28, Updated date: 2021-10-24 19:55:12
How are the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | LG G5 (2016) 32GB | |||
General rating: | 54.1/100 (The 1416th of all smartphones) | 61/100 (The 1239th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 53/100 | 59/100 | ||
Screen quality | 61/100 | 84/100 | ||
Performance | 56/100 | 67/100 | ||
Storage size | 78/100 | 78/100 | ||
Battery | 90/100 | 85/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 72/100 | 80/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 80/100 | 80/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and the "LG G5 (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "LG G5 (2016) 32GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "LG G5 (2016) 32GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "LG G5 (2016) 32GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "LG G5 (2016) 32GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "LG G5 (2016) 32GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "LG G5 (2016) 32GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" or "LG G5 (2016) 32GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and the "LG G5 (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "LG G5 (2016) 32GB"
The design of Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB
The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is 153.5mm long, 77.5mm wide, and 8.5mm thick. It weighs 167.0g.
The design of LG G5 (2016) 32GB
The "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" is 149.4mm long, 73.9mm wide, and 7.7mm thick. It weighs 159.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 4mm in length, 3.5mm in width, and 0.7mm in thickness. "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" is bigger than "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Both the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 8g. "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" weighs less than "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and is easier to handle.
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | LG G5 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 58/100 | 67/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 41/100 | 46/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 57/100 | 61/100 |
Compare the display of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "LG G5 (2016) 32GB"
Display of the Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB
The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Display of the LG G5 (2016) 32GB
The "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1440 x 2560, and the pixel density is 554ppi. The "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" has a 5.3inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and the "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and the "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB". The "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | LG G5 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 72/100 | 70/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 73/100 | 71/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "LG G5 (2016) 32GB"
Camera performance of Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB
The main camera of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of LG G5 (2016) 32GB
The main camera of the "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" has 16.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 3MP difference in comparison. As for taking photos of scenic places or group photos of people, the rear camera of "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" is more suited for capturing distant objects. The "LG G5 (2016) 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. Both the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and the "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | LG G5 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 80/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "LG G5 (2016) 32GB"
The processing capability of the Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" uses the Cortex-A53 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
The processing capability of the LG G5 (2016) 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", the "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and the "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" are not large at all. For people who mostly use their phone to look up things on the internet, watch videos, or occasionally play mini games, the "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" edges out the competition.
For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" than the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB".
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | LG G5 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 73/100 | 77/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 45/100 | 60/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "LG G5 (2016) 32GB"
Battery performance of Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB
The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Battery performance of LG G5 (2016) 32GB
The "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2800.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 200mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For average daily use, for example looking things up online, SNS, gaming or occasionally checking your screen I can recommend the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" slightly more. Both the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and the "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and the "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | LG G5 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 90/100 | 85/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 79/100 | 71/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "LG G5 (2016) 32GB"
The storage capacity of the Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB
The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the LG G5 (2016) 32GB
The "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 1024.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
If you are only downloading a few games and apps (such as SNS) to use on your phone, it really doesn't matter if you choose "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" or "LG G5 (2016) 32GB". If you are hoping to install many different games on their phone, the amount of storage is the same no matter which of these two devices you choose to buy.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 896GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. Both the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and the "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | LG G5 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 78/100 | 78/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 78/100 | 96/100 |
Which to buy, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" or "LG G5 (2016) 32GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" or "LG G5 (2016) 32GB"?
"LG G5 (2016) 32GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.3inch makes the "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. When comparing "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" overall, "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" is a more balanced model and is recommended.
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | LG G5 (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 53/100 | 59/100 |
Display | 61/100 | 84/100 |
CPU specs | 56/100 | 67/100 |
General rating | 66/100 | 74/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Is it recommended to buy the LG G5 (2016) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
What are the spec differences between the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "LG G5 (2016) 32GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "LG G5 (2016) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | LG G5 (2016) 32GB | |
Color | Black/Gold/Deep Bleen/Cherry Red | Silver/Titan/Gold/Pink |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 77.5mm x 153.5mm x 8.5mm | 73.9mm x 149.4mm x 7.7mm |
Weight | 167.0g | 159.0g |
Display size | 5.5inch | 5.3inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 1440 x 2560 |
Pixel density | 267ppi | 554ppi |
Battery capacity | 3000.0mAh | 2800.0mAh |
Chipset | Cortex-A53 | Qualcomm MSM8996 Snapdragon 820 |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 2.15GHz+1.6GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 16.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |