Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB vs Nokia Lumia 530 4GB
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:37:13, Updated date: 2020-04-16 17:49:21
How are the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | Nokia Lumia 530 4GB | |||
General rating: | 54.1/100 (The 1416th of all smartphones) | 34.3/100 (The 1897th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 53/100 | 72/100 | ||
Screen quality | 61/100 | 34/100 | ||
Performance | 56/100 | 23/100 | ||
Storage size | 78/100 | 17/100 | ||
Battery | 90/100 | 56/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 72/100 | 35/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 80/100 | - /100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and the "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" or "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and the "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB"
The design of Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB
The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is 153.5mm long, 77.5mm wide, and 8.5mm thick. It weighs 167.0g.
The design of Nokia Lumia 530 4GB
The "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB" is 119.7mm long, 62.3mm wide, and 11.7mm thick. It weighs 129.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 33.8mm in length, 15.2mm in width, and 3.1mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. The "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB" is also much easier to carry around, and scores more points than the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" for portability.
The difference in weight is 38g. The "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | Nokia Lumia 530 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 58/100 | 77/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 41/100 | 70/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 57/100 | 68/100 |
Compare the display of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB"
Display of the Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB
The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Display of the Nokia Lumia 530 4GB
The "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 244ppi. The "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB" has a 4.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.
The display of "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" looks sleeker than that of "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" nor the "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | Nokia Lumia 530 4GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 72/100 | 46/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 73/100 | 25/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB"
Camera performance of Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB
The main camera of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Camera performance of Nokia Lumia 530 4GB
The main camera of the "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB" has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 8MP difference in comparison. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | Nokia Lumia 530 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 35/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 80/100 | - |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB"
The processing capability of the Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" uses the Cortex-A53 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
The processing capability of the Nokia Lumia 530 4GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB" uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB", the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 509GB difference in memory capacity. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB".
The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" than the "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB". The "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | Nokia Lumia 530 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 73/100 | 44/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 45/100 | 6/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB"
Battery performance of Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB
The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Battery performance of Nokia Lumia 530 4GB
The "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB" has a battery capacity of 1430.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1570mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" over the "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB". The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | Nokia Lumia 530 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 90/100 | 56/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 79/100 | 34/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB"
The storage capacity of the Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB
The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Nokia Lumia 530 4GB
The "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 28GB. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 100GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. Both the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and the "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | Nokia Lumia 530 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 78/100 | 17/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 78/100 | 90/100 |
Which to buy, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" or "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" or "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and the "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB", the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is overall the clear winner.
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | Nokia Lumia 530 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 53/100 | 72/100 |
Display | 61/100 | 34/100 |
CPU specs | 56/100 | 23/100 |
General rating | 66/100 | 42/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Nokia Lumia 530 4GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and "Nokia Lumia 530 4GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | Nokia Lumia 530 4GB | |
Color | Black/Gold/Deep Bleen/Cherry Red | Bright orange/Bright green/White/Dark grey |
OS | Android | Windows |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 77.5mm x 153.5mm x 8.5mm | 62.3mm x 119.7mm x 11.7mm |
Weight | 167.0g | 129.0g |
Display size | 5.5inch | 4.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | TFT |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 480 x 854 |
Pixel density | 267ppi | 244ppi |
Battery capacity | 3000.0mAh | 1430.0mAh |
Chipset | Cortex-A53 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 |
CPU specs | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 3.0GB | 512.0MB |
Storage size | 32.0GB | 4.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 5.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 8.0MP | |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |