Compare Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB vs Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:59:22, Updated date: 2020-04-15 21:45:30
Which do we recommend after comparing the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" and the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" or "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" ?
What is the difference between the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" and the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"
The design of Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB
The "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" is 143.0mm long, 70.4mm wide, and 8.3mm thick. It weighs 142.0g.
The design of Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB
The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is 153.5mm long, 77.5mm wide, and 8.5mm thick. It weighs 167.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 10.5mm in length, 7mm in width, and 0.1mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" is more compact than "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 25g. The "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB | Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 71/100 | 58/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 60/100 | 41/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 64/100 | 57/100 |
Compare the display of the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"
Display of the Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB
The "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Display of the Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB
The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The display of "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" looks sleeker than that of "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" nor the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB | Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 68/100 | 72/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 60/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"
Camera performance of Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB
The main camera of the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB
The main camera of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" and the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB | Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"
The processing capability of the Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" uses the Mediatek MT6735P SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.
The processing capability of the Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" uses the Cortex-A53 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB", the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 2GB difference in memory capacity. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB". The "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" than the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB". The "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB | Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 38/100 | 73/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 11/100 | 45/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"
Battery performance of Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB
The "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2200.0mAh.
Battery performance of Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB
The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 800mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" over the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB". Both the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" and the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB | Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 76/100 | 90/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 56/100 | 79/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"
The storage capacity of the Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB
The "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 64.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB
The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 24GB. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 88GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB | Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 35/100 | 78/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 66/100 | 78/100 |
Which to buy, the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" or "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" or "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" is a great choice. If you want a larger screen, "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is recommended as it has a 5.5inch screen. The "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" and the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB", the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is overall the clear winner.
Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB | Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 65/100 | 53/100 |
Display | 56/100 | 61/100 |
CPU specs | 25/100 | 56/100 |
General rating | 52/100 | 66/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB" and "Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
Yezz Andy 5M LTE 8GB | Wiko Upulse (2017) 32GB | |
Color | Black | Black/Gold/Deep Bleen/Cherry Red |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 70.4mm x 143.0mm x 8.3mm | 77.5mm x 153.5mm x 8.5mm |
Weight | 142.0g | 167.0g |
Display size | 5.0inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 720 x 1280 |
Pixel density | 293ppi | 267ppi |
Battery capacity | 2200.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | Mediatek MT6735P | Cortex-A53 |
CPU specs | 1.0GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 1.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 8.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |