Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

ZTE Blade A3 32GB vs HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB: Full Comparison!

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:04:41, Updated date: 2020-04-15 21:50:22

ZTE Blade A3 32GBHTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB
ZTE Blade A3 32GBHTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" and "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" and "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB".

ZTE Blade A3 32GBHTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB
ZTE Blade A3 32GB

HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB

General rating:

53.2/100

(The 1441th of all smartphones)

37/100

(The 867th of all smartphones)

Grip
56/100
60/100
Screen quality
61/100
41/100
Performance
59/100
20/100
Storage size
78/100
17/100
Battery
100/100
50/100
Rear-camera resolution
72/100
35/100
Front-camera resolution
65/100
46/100

What is the difference between the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" and the "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" and "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB"

The design of ZTE Blade A3 32GB

The "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" is 152.4mm long, 75.8mm wide, and 8.2mm thick. It weighs 164.0g.

The design of HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB

The "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB" is 126.0mm long, 65.0mm wide, and 13.5mm thick. It weighs 171.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 26.4mm in length, 10.7mm in width, and 5.3mm in thickness. "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB" is easy to use with a single hand, and its size makes it easier to hold. "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB" is bigger than "ZTE Blade A3 32GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Also, "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB" is more compact than "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 7g. There is very little difference in weight between the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" and "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.

ZTE Blade A3 32GB

HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB

Ease of holding it in one hand62/10071/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand43/10038/100
Ease of carrying around59/10064/100

Compare the display of the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" and "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB"

Display of the ZTE Blade A3 32GB

The "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Display of the HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB

The "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB" uses a TFT liquid crystal. The resolution is 540 x 960, and the pixel density is 256ppi. The "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB" has a 4.3inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 1.2inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" and "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" nor the "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

ZTE Blade A3 32GB

HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?72/10056/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?73/10033/100

Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" and "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB"

Camera performance of ZTE Blade A3 32GB

The main camera of the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB

The main camera of the "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 1.3MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 8MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ZTE Blade A3 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 3.7MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "ZTE Blade A3 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "ZTE Blade A3 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

ZTE Blade A3 32GB

HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10035/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/10046/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" and "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB"

The processing capability of the ZTE Blade A3 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6737T SoC. The CPU performance is 1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

The processing capability of the HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB" uses the Snapdragon S3 MSM8660 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB", the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 2GB difference in memory capacity. The "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB". The "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

The "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" than the "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB". The "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Blade A3 32GB

HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet75/10027/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games47/1009/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" and "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB"

Battery performance of ZTE Blade A3 32GB

The "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.

Battery performance of HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB

The "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB" has a battery capacity of 1730.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 2270mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" over the "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB". The "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

ZTE Blade A3 32GB

HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet100/10050/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos100/10028/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" and "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB"

The storage capacity of the ZTE Blade A3 32GB

The "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB

The "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 28GB. The "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 252GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Blade A3 32GB

HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games78/10017/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos90/10055/100

Which to buy, the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" or "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" or "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB"?

When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" and "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB". Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" and the "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB", the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" is overall the clear winner.

ZTE Blade A3 32GB

HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB

Handling56/10060/100
Display61/10041/100
CPU specs59/10020/100
General rating69/10039/100

Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Blade A3 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. When looking at its overall specs, the "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB" is a mid-to-low range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" and "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Blade A3 32GB" and "HTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

ZTE Blade A3 32GBHTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB
ZTE Blade A3 32GBHTC EVO 3D ISW12HT au 4GB
ColorBlue/Black
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)75.8mm x 152.4mm x 8.2mm65.0mm x 126.0mm x 13.5mm
Weight164.0g171.0g
Display size5.5inch4.3inch
Display typeIPS LCDTFT
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280540 x 960
Pixel density267ppi256ppi
Battery capacity4000.0mAh1730.0mAh
ChipsetMediatek MT6737TSnapdragon S3 MSM8660
CPU specs1.5GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.2GHz×2(2.0-cores)
RAM size3.0GB1.0GB
Storage size32.0GB4.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP5.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP1.3MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles