Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB vs Coolpad Note 3s 32GB: Full Comparison!

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:49:02, Updated date: 2020-04-15 19:51:27

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GBCoolpad Note 3s 32GB
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GBCoolpad Note 3s 32GB

How are the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GBCoolpad Note 3s 32GB
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.7
54/100
rating-image2.7
54/100
Screen qualityrating-image3.1
61/100
rating-image3.1
61/100
Performancerating-image2.4
48/100
rating-image3.2
64/100
Storage sizerating-image3.5
70/100
rating-image3.9
78/100
Batteryrating-image4.5
90/100
rating-image3.9
78/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image3.6
72/100
rating-image3.6
72/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image3.3
65/100
rating-image3.3
65/100

What is the difference between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB"

The design of ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is 156.0mm long, 77.5mm wide, and 8.9mm thick. It weighs 156.0g.

The design of Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" is 154.5mm long, 77.4mm wide, and 8.3mm thick. It weighs 163.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

Both the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB". Both the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.

The difference in weight is 7g. There is very little difference in weight between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

Ease of holding it in one hand57/10059/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand48/10044/100
Ease of carrying around56/10057/100

Compare the display of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB"

Display of the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Display of the Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" nor the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?72/10072/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?73/10073/100

Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB"

Camera performance of ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

The main camera of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

The main camera of the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/10065/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB"

The processing capability of the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

The processing capability of the Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8929 Snapdragon 415 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For using fundamental features such as calls, emails, messages and using SNS, I am more inclined to recommend the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB". The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB".

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet71/10077/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games33/10051/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB"

Battery performance of ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" has a battery capacity of 2500.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 500mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you use the phone infrequently for just making calls or checking the time, I think the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is a bit better. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" over the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB". Both the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet90/10078/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos79/10058/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB"

The storage capacity of the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 208GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/10078/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos90/10065/100

Which to buy, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" or "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" or "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB"?

When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB". If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB". The "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Because both have advantages and disadvantages, I think that it is best to stick to the most important points that you want to emphasize.

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Coolpad Note 3s 32GB

Handling54/10054/100
Display61/10061/100
CPU specs48/10064/100
General rating63/10063/100

Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Coolpad Note 3s 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Coolpad Note 3s 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GBCoolpad Note 3s 32GB
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GBCoolpad Note 3s 32GB
ColorBlackWhite/Gold
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)77.5mm x 156.0mm x 8.9mm77.4mm x 154.5mm x 8.3mm
Weight156.0g163.0g
Display size5.5inch5.5inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280720 x 1280
Pixel density267ppi267ppi
Battery capacity3000.0mAh2500.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425Qualcomm MSM8929 Snapdragon 415
CPU specs1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.3GHz+1.0GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB3.0GB
Storage size16.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP5.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles