Which one is better, the Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB or ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!
Created date: 2018-09-30 21:43:29, Updated date: 2020-04-16 21:30:13
How are the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB | Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB | |||
General rating: | 50.3/100 (The 1506th of all smartphones) | 38.4/100 (The 1779th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 54/100 | 69/100 | ||
Screen quality | 61/100 | 43/100 | ||
Performance | 48/100 | 36/100 | ||
Storage size | 70/100 | 35/100 | ||
Battery | 90/100 | 71/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 72/100 | 35/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 65/100 | 50/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" or "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB" ?
What is the difference between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB"
The design of ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is 156.0mm long, 77.5mm wide, and 8.9mm thick. It weighs 156.0g.
The design of Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB
The "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB" is 131.8mm long, 65.4mm wide, and 10.9mm thick. It weighs 136.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 24.1mm in length, 12mm in width, and 2mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB" is more compact than "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 20g. The "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB | Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 57/100 | 73/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 48/100 | 65/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 56/100 | 66/100 |
Compare the display of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB"
Display of the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Display of the Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB
The "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 540 x 960, and the pixel density is 244ppi. The "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB" has a 4.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 1inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. The larger display on the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is easy on the eyes, making it the better choice for surfing the web or browsing social media. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The display of "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" looks sleeker than that of "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" nor the "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB | Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 72/100 | 59/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 73/100 | 41/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB"
Camera performance of ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB
The main camera of the "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 2.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 8MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB | Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 35/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | 50/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB"
The processing capability of the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
The processing capability of the Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.5GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB", the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 0.5GB difference in memory capacity. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB".
For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" than the "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB". The "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB | Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 71/100 | 56/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 33/100 | 21/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB"
Battery performance of ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Battery performance of Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB
The "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" over the "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB". Both the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB | Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 90/100 | 71/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 79/100 | 47/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB"
The storage capacity of the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB
The "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB" has 8.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 8GB. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 232GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB | Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 70/100 | 35/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 90/100 | 56/100 |
Which to buy, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" or "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" or "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" a lot easier to use. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB", the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is overall the clear winner.
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB | Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 54/100 | 69/100 |
Display | 61/100 | 43/100 |
CPU specs | 48/100 | 36/100 |
General rating | 63/100 | 47/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB | Kyocera Hydro Life 8GB | |
Color | Black | Black |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 77.5mm x 156.0mm x 8.9mm | 65.4mm x 131.8mm x 10.9mm |
Weight | 156.0g | 136.0g |
Display size | 5.5inch | 4.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 540 x 960 |
Pixel density | 267ppi | 244ppi |
Battery capacity | 3000.0mAh | 2000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 | Qualcomm MSM8212 Snapdragon 200 |
CPU specs | 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.2GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 1.5GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 8.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 5.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 2.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |