Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB vs. NIU Andy 5T (2014) Specs & Scores

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:38:03, Updated date: 2020-04-15 20:40:28

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GBNIU Andy 5T (2014)
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GBNIU Andy 5T (2014)

Which do we recommend after comparing the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "NIU Andy 5T (2014)"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "NIU Andy 5T (2014)".

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GBNIU Andy 5T (2014)
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

NIU Andy 5T (2014)
General rating:
Griprating-image2.7
54/100
rating-image3.6
71/100
Screen qualityrating-image3.1
61/100
rating-image2.8
56/100
Performancerating-image2.4
48/100
rating-image1.4
28/100
Storage sizerating-image3.5
70/100
rating-image1
17/100
Batteryrating-image4.5
90/100
rating-image2.9
57/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image3.6
72/100
rating-image3.6
72/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image3.3
65/100
rating-image3.3
65/100

What is the difference between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "NIU Andy 5T (2014)"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "NIU Andy 5T (2014)"

The design of ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is 156.0mm long, 77.5mm wide, and 8.9mm thick. It weighs 156.0g.

The design of NIU Andy 5T (2014)

The "NIU Andy 5T (2014)" is 144.0mm long, 69.7mm wide, and 6.9mm thick. It weighs 123.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 12mm in length, 7.7mm in width, and 2mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "NIU Andy 5T (2014)" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "NIU Andy 5T (2014)", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "NIU Andy 5T (2014)" is more compact than "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 33g. The "NIU Andy 5T (2014)" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

NIU Andy 5T (2014)

Ease of holding it in one hand57/10073/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand48/10075/100
Ease of carrying around56/10066/100

Compare the display of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "NIU Andy 5T (2014)"

Display of the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Display of the NIU Andy 5T (2014)

The "NIU Andy 5T (2014)" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 293ppi. The "NIU Andy 5T (2014)" has a 5.0inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The display of "NIU Andy 5T (2014)" looks sleeker than that of "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", and is more suited for everyday use such looking things up on the Internet and playing mobile games. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" nor the "NIU Andy 5T (2014)" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

NIU Andy 5T (2014)

How suited is the screen for usual usage?72/10068/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?73/10060/100

Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "NIU Andy 5T (2014)"

Camera performance of ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

The main camera of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of NIU Andy 5T (2014)

The main camera of the "NIU Andy 5T (2014)" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "NIU Andy 5T (2014)" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "NIU Andy 5T (2014)" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "NIU Andy 5T (2014)" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

NIU Andy 5T (2014)

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?72/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/10065/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "NIU Andy 5T (2014)"

The processing capability of the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

The processing capability of the NIU Andy 5T (2014)

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "NIU Andy 5T (2014)" uses the Mediatek MT6582 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 1.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "NIU Andy 5T (2014)", the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "NIU Andy 5T (2014)". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB".

For playing 2D and simpler 3D games, "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is more suitable as the games are less likely to stall. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" than the "NIU Andy 5T (2014)". The "NIU Andy 5T (2014)" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

NIU Andy 5T (2014)

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet71/10047/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games33/10012/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "NIU Andy 5T (2014)"

Battery performance of ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Battery performance of NIU Andy 5T (2014)

The "NIU Andy 5T (2014)" has a battery capacity of 1800.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1200mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" over the "NIU Andy 5T (2014)". The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

NIU Andy 5T (2014)

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet90/10057/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos79/10034/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "NIU Andy 5T (2014)"

The storage capacity of the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the NIU Andy 5T (2014)

The "NIU Andy 5T (2014)" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 12GB. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "NIU Andy 5T (2014)" unfortunately falls behind here. The "NIU Andy 5T (2014)" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 12GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" or "NIU Andy 5T (2014)". Both the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "NIU Andy 5T (2014)" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

NIU Andy 5T (2014)

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/10017/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos90/10090/100

Which to buy, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" or "NIU Andy 5T (2014)"

At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" or "NIU Andy 5T (2014)"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "NIU Andy 5T (2014)" is a great choice. If you want a larger screen, "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is recommended as it has a 5.5inch screen. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "NIU Andy 5T (2014)", the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is overall the clear winner.

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB

NIU Andy 5T (2014)

Handling54/10071/100
Display61/10056/100
CPU specs48/10028/100
General rating63/10051/100

Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the NIU Andy 5T (2014), compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "NIU Andy 5T (2014)" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Also, its specs show that its processing abilities are a bit lower than the average smartphone. This may be okay for people who don't often use their phone, but it's a good idea for people who intend to use it as their main device to choose a smartphone with higher performance capabilities. Judging from the overall specs, the "NIU Andy 5T (2014)" is a mid-range smartphone.

What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "NIU Andy 5T (2014)" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "NIU Andy 5T (2014)". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GBNIU Andy 5T (2014)
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GBNIU Andy 5T (2014)
ColorBlackwhite,black,blue,red
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)77.5mm x 156.0mm x 8.9mm69.7mm x 144.0mm x 6.9mm
Weight156.0g123.0g
Display size5.5inch5.0inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280720 x 1280
Pixel density267ppi293ppi
Battery capacity3000.0mAh1800.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425Mediatek MT6582
CPU specs1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.3GHz×4(4.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB1.0GB
Storage size16.0GB4.0GB
Rear-camera resolution13.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP5.0MP

Check price

New articles