ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB vs verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB: Which is the best?
Created date: 2018-09-30 21:23:26, Updated date: 2022-05-31 12:59:48
How are the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB | verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB | |||
General rating: | 50.3/100 (The 1506th of all smartphones) | 29.5/100 (The 1977th of all smartphones) | ||
Grip | 54/100 | 61/100 | ||
Screen quality | 61/100 | 48/100 | ||
Performance | 48/100 | 15/100 | ||
Storage size | 70/100 | 17/100 | ||
Battery | 90/100 | 70/100 | ||
Rear-camera resolution | 72/100 | 35/100 | ||
Front-camera resolution | 65/100 | 55/100 | ||
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" or "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB" ?
What is the difference between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB"
The design of ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is 156.0mm long, 77.5mm wide, and 8.9mm thick. It weighs 156.0g.
The design of verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB
The "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB" is 145.0mm long, 71.5mm wide, and 8.9mm thick. It weighs 159.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB" easier to use and carry around. "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB" is bigger than "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Also, "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB" is more compact than "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 3g. There is very little difference in weight between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB", meaning that the burden on the hands even when used for a long time is pretty much the same.
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB | verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 57/100 | 70/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 48/100 | 46/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 56/100 | 63/100 |
Compare the display of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB"
Display of the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Display of the verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB
The "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 480 x 854, and the pixel density is 195ppi. The "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB" has a 5.0inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.5inch difference in the display sizes. Lining up the displays side by side makes the difference in size clearly visible. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. In the gaming end, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" offers a more suitable screen size. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is comparatively more suited for use with VR as it has a sleeker display. Neither the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" nor the "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB | verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 72/100 | 68/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 73/100 | 60/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB"
Camera performance of ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB
The main camera of the "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB" has 5.0MP. The front camera has 3.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 8MP difference in comparison. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
There is a 2MP difference in front camera pixel number. When taking photos of distant objects, including photos taken using a selfie stick or photos that require clear backgrounds, the camera of "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has better performance. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB | verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 35/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | 55/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB"
The processing capability of the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
The processing capability of the verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB" uses the Mediatek MT6572M SoC. The CPU performance is 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores). The memory capacity is 512.0MB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB", the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 510GB difference in memory capacity. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has more memory storage, making the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is the better choice to buy over the "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". The "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" than the "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB". The "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB | verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 71/100 | 24/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 33/100 | 4/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB"
Battery performance of ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Battery performance of verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB
The "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB" has a battery capacity of 2000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" over the "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB". Both the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
The battery life of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB | verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 90/100 | 70/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 79/100 | 44/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB"
The storage capacity of the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB
The "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB" has 4.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 32.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 12GB. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 236GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB | verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 70/100 | 17/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 90/100 | 55/100 |
Which to buy, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" or "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" or "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB"?
"verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" a lot easier to use. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB", the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is overall the clear winner.
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB | verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 54/100 | 61/100 |
Display | 61/100 | 48/100 |
CPU specs | 48/100 | 15/100 |
General rating | 63/100 | 42/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Is it recommended to buy the verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Again, when compared to the average smartphone the processing power is fairly low. I'm sure you could get by with it if you're just making calls and emails, but if you plan on using apps I recommend going for a phone a rank up from this. Judging from the overall specs, the "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB" is a mid-range smartphone.
What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB | verykool s5001 Lotus 4GB | |
Color | Black | Drak Blue/White |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 77.5mm x 156.0mm x 8.9mm | 71.5mm x 145.0mm x 8.9mm |
Weight | 156.0g | 159.0g |
Display size | 5.5inch | 5.0inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 480 x 854 |
Pixel density | 267ppi | 195ppi |
Battery capacity | 3000.0mAh | 2000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 | Mediatek MT6572M |
CPU specs | 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.0GHz×2(2.0-cores) |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 512.0MB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 4.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 5.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 3.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |