ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB vs vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB: Which is the best?
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:54:06, Updated date: 2020-04-16 17:59:47
How are the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" or "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" ?
What is the difference between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB"
The design of ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is 156.0mm long, 77.5mm wide, and 8.9mm thick. It weighs 156.0g.
The design of vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB
The "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" is 153.9mm long, 77.1mm wide, and 7.6mm thick. It weighs 168.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 2mm in length, 0.4mm in width, and 1.3mm in thickness. Both the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" are equally easy to use with one hand. Hiragana flick input is basically just as easy to use with "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB". Both the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" are basically equally portable and easy to handle.
The difference in weight is 12g. "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" weighs less than "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" and is easier to handle.
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB | vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 57/100 | 61/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 48/100 | 40/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 56/100 | 58/100 |
Compare the display of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB"
Display of the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Display of the vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB
The "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 400ppi. The "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB | vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 72/100 | 72/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 73/100 | 73/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB"
Camera performance of ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB
The main camera of the "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
There is very little difference in the performance (or pixel count) of "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" when shooting distant objects or Instagrammable landscapes. Also, when using the rear camera to snap close shots of photogenic sweets or meals, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones. Both the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB | vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 72/100 | 72/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | 80/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB"
The processing capability of the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
The processing capability of the vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", the "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 2GB difference in memory capacity. The "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB". The "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
The "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" than the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB". The "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB | vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 71/100 | 85/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 33/100 | 79/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB"
Battery performance of ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Battery performance of vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB
The "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB". Both the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
If you're playing games or watching movies for a longer amount of time, or plan on using it for long periods, the battery of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" may be slightly better. Both the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB | vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 90/100 | 87/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 79/100 | 74/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB"
The storage capacity of the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB
The "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB
The "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 16GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" or "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB". Both the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and the "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB | vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 70/100 | 78/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 90/100 | 90/100 |
Which to buy, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" or "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" or "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB"?
When it comes to being easy to handle and carry around, there is hardly any difference between "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB". Its perfect screen size of 5.5inch makes the "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" and the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB", the "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" is overall the clear winner.
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB | vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 54/100 | 54/100 |
Display | 61/100 | 74/100 |
CPU specs | 48/100 | 82/100 |
General rating | 63/100 | 73/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Is it recommended to buy the vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB" and "vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
ZTE Blade X (2017) 16GB | vivo V3Max (2016) 32GB | |
Color | Black | Gold |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 77.5mm x 156.0mm x 8.9mm | 77.1mm x 153.9mm x 7.6mm |
Weight | 156.0g | 168.0g |
Display size | 5.5inch | 5.5inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 267ppi | 400ppi |
Battery capacity | 3000.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 | Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 |
CPU specs | 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores) |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 4.0GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 13.0MP | 13.0MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 8.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |