ZTE Blade Force 16GB vs. AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB Specs & Scores
Created date: 2018-09-30 22:30:41, Updated date: 2020-04-16 16:50:59
Which do we recommend after comparing the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB".
Contents
- 1.What is the difference between the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
- 1-1.Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB"
- 1-2.Compare the display of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB"
- 1-3.Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB"
- 1-4.Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB"
- 1-5.Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB"
- 1-6.Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB"
- 2.Which to buy, the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" or "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB"
- 3.What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" ?
What is the difference between the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance
Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB"
The design of ZTE Blade Force 16GB
The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" is 156.0mm long, 78.0mm wide, and 9.1mm thick. It weighs 170.1g.
The design of AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB
The "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" is 149.0mm long, 73.0mm wide, and 7.6mm thick. It weighs 155.0g.
Which is the better design to use?
In comparison, the size difference is 7mm in length, 5mm in width, and 1.5mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" is more compact than "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.
The difference in weight is 15g. The "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.
ZTE Blade Force 16GB | AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Ease of holding it in one hand | 56/100 | 69/100 |
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand | 39/100 | 49/100 |
Ease of carrying around | 55/100 | 62/100 |
Compare the display of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB"
Display of the ZTE Blade Force 16GB
The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.
Display of the AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB
The "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" uses a IGZO liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 415ppi. The "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" has a 5.3inch screen size.
Which has a better screen?
This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
In terms of display, the "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB". The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has the performance needed for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Blade Force 16GB | AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
How suited is the screen for usual usage? | 72/100 | 70/100 |
How suited is the screen to play games on? | 73/100 | 71/100 |
Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB"
Camera performance of ZTE Blade Force 16GB
The main camera of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Camera performance of AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB
The main camera of the "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" has 22.6MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.
Which camera performance is better?
The back cameras thus have a 14.6MP difference in comparison. The "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.
When shooting objects or people with the front phone camera from a short distance, such as taking a selfie with a selfie-stick, there is very little difference between the pixel counts of the two phones, even when it comes to the scenery in the background of such photographs. There is not much difference between the pixel counts of "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" when it comes to taking close-up photographs such as selfies or profile pics with the front phone camera.
ZTE Blade Force 16GB | AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera? | 50/100 | 96/100 |
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera? | 65/100 | 65/100 |
Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB"
The processing capability of the ZTE Blade Force 16GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8920 Snapdragon 427 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.
The processing capability of the AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB
Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" uses the Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 SoC. The CPU performance is 2.15GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.
Which has the better processing capability?
As compared to the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB", the "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.
For phone calls, emails, messaging, using SNS or most fundamental features, the differences between the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" are not large at all. For people who mostly use their phone to look up things on the internet, watch videos, or occasionally play mini games, the "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" edges out the competition.
The "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" than the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB".
ZTE Blade Force 16GB | AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet | 71/100 | 75/100 |
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games | 33/100 | 48/100 |
Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB"
Battery performance of ZTE Blade Force 16GB
The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Battery performance of AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB
The "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.
Which battery perfomances is better?
With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.
If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB". Both the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices. Both the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Blade Force 16GB | AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet | 90/100 | 89/100 |
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos | 79/100 | 77/100 |
Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB"
The storage capacity of the ZTE Blade Force 16GB
The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.
The storage capacity of the AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB
The "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 200.0GB can be used.
Which has the easier storage to use?
The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.
When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 88GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. Both the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.
ZTE Blade Force 16GB | AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Review on the storage capacity when playing many games | 70/100 | 78/100 |
Review on when you store many pictures and videos | 76/100 | 87/100 |
Which to buy, the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" or "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB"
At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" or "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB"?
If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.3inch makes the "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" a lot easier to use. The "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" and the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB", the "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" is overall the clear winner.
ZTE Blade Force 16GB | AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB | |
---|---|---|
Handling | 51/100 | 61/100 |
Display | 61/100 | 74/100 |
CPU specs | 48/100 | 59/100 |
General rating | 60/100 | 71/100 |
Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Blade Force 16GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
Is it recommended to buy the AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB, compared with other smartphones?
Compared to other smart phones, the "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.
Want to read it together
What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB" ?
A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.
ZTE Blade Force 16GB | AQUOS Xx3 SoftBank 32GB | |
Color | Blue | / / / |
OS | Android | Android |
Dimensions (width x height x thickness) | 78.0mm x 156.0mm x 9.1mm | 73.0mm x 149.0mm x 7.6mm |
Weight | 170.1g | 155.0g |
Display size | 5.5inch | 5.3inch |
Display type | IPS LCD | IGZO |
Screen resolution (width x height) | 720 x 1280 | 1080 x 1920 |
Pixel density | 267ppi | 415ppi |
Battery capacity | 3000.0mAh | 3000.0mAh |
Chipset | Qualcomm MSM8920 Snapdragon 427 | Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 |
CPU specs | 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores) | 2.15GHz×4(4.0-cores) |
RAM size | 2.0GB | 3.0GB |
Storage size | 16.0GB | 32.0GB |
Rear-camera resolution | 8.0MP | 22.6MP |
Front-camera resolution | 5.0MP | 5.0MP |
Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones | Look at a smartphone Compare smartphones |