Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

ZTE Blade Force 16GB and Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB review

Created date: 2018-09-30 22:42:21, Updated date: 2021-10-20 21:55:08

ZTE Blade Force 16GBArchos Diamond Alpha 64GB
ZTE Blade Force 16GBArchos Diamond Alpha 64GB

Which do we recommend after comparing the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB"? We evaluated the differences between the two models. This article is recommended for those who are trying to choose between the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB".

ZTE Blade Force 16GBArchos Diamond Alpha 64GB
ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.6
51/100
rating-image3.1
62/100
Screen qualityrating-image3.1
61/100
rating-image3.7
74/100
Performancerating-image2.4
48/100
rating-image4.1
82/100
Storage sizerating-image3.5
70/100
rating-image4.2
84/100
Batteryrating-image4.5
90/100
rating-image4.7
93/100
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image2.5
50/100
rating-image3.6
72/100
Front-camera resolutionrating-image3.3
65/100
rating-image5.0
100/100

What is the difference between the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB"

The design of ZTE Blade Force 16GB

The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" is 156.0mm long, 78.0mm wide, and 9.1mm thick. It weighs 170.1g.

The design of Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB

The "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" is 146.7mm long, 72.5mm wide, and 7.5mm thick. It weighs 155.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

In comparison, the size difference is 9.3mm in length, 5.5mm in width, and 1.5mm in thickness. Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" easier to use and carry around. Flick typing is easier on the "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB", making it relatively more user-friendly. Also, "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" is more compact than "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 15g. The "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" is much lighter, putting less burden on the hand.

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB

Ease of holding it in one hand56/10070/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand39/10049/100
Ease of carrying around55/10063/100

Compare the display of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB"

Display of the ZTE Blade Force 16GB

The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Display of the Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB

The "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 1080 x 1920, and the pixel density is 423ppi. The "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

In terms of display, the "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" is a better choice for those looking to use their phone for browsing the web or for gaming. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. The "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" also offers a crisp, cleaner display when using a VR headset than the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB". The "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, but the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" shows only an unsatisfactory performance.

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?72/10070/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?73/10070/100

Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB"

Camera performance of ZTE Blade Force 16GB

The main camera of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB

The main camera of the "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 16.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 11MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose. The "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?50/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/100100/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB"

The processing capability of the ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8920 Snapdragon 427 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

The processing capability of the Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 4.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB", the "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 2GB difference in memory capacity. The "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" has more memory storage, making the "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" is the better choice to buy over the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB". The "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" than the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB". The "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet71/10085/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games33/10079/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB"

Battery performance of ZTE Blade Force 16GB

The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB

The "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" has a battery capacity of 2950.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 50mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

If you only use it to make phone calls or checking the time there is no large difference between them. For looking things up online, checking SNS, playing games occasionally or for most frequent use, it doesn't feel like there is much difference between the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB". Both the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

If you're using it frequently, for example playing games for a long time or using it to watch movies, you may feel no difference between the two devices. Both the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet90/10093/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos79/10083/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB"

The storage capacity of the ZTE Blade Force 16GB

The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB

The "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" has 64.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 256.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 48GB. The "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" offers plenty of storage for those looking to use a few social media apps and games. Avid gamers should look to the "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here. The "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 176GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. The "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" will support you with its large storage all the way as you download photos and videos to your heart's content. Both the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/10084/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos76/10091/100

Which to buy, the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" or "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" or "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB"?

If you're looking for something that's easy to hold, the compact "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" is a great choice. Its perfect screen size of 5.2inch makes the "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" a lot easier to use. The "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" and the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB", the "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" is overall the clear winner.

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB

Handling51/10062/100
Display61/10074/100
CPU specs48/10082/100
General rating60/10078/100

Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Blade Force 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smart phones, the "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" has a size that is easy to hold, and looks compact. It can be easily operated with one hand. The screen size is larger than that of standard smartphones. It is suited for typing long texts and so can be used to read or edit office texts. In addition, its processing capability is quite excellent compared to the average smart phone. It is suitable for almost all uses, including games and VR. It may be a bit extravagant for normal use. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Archos Diamond Alpha 64GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

ZTE Blade Force 16GBArchos Diamond Alpha 64GB
ZTE Blade Force 16GBArchos Diamond Alpha 64GB
ColorBlueBlack
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)78.0mm x 156.0mm x 9.1mm72.5mm x 146.7mm x 7.5mm
Weight170.1g155.0g
Display size5.5inch5.2inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 12801080 x 1920
Pixel density267ppi423ppi
Battery capacity3000.0mAh2950.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8920 Snapdragon 427Qualcomm MSM8976 Snapdragon 652
CPU specs1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.8GHz+1.4GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB4.0GB
Storage size16.0GB64.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP16.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles