Browsing this site requires consent to the privacy policy. By continuing to browse, you agree to our privacy policy. If you do not agree, please stop browsing. Privacy policy

All our articles is independent of any advertiser or commercial initiative, and if you buy something through our posts, we may get a small share of the sale. Click here for more information.

Which one is better, the Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB or ZTE Blade Force 16GB? We did a deep-dive comparison categorised by purpose of use!

Created date: 2018-09-30 23:30:06, Updated date: 2021-10-20 17:08:38

ZTE Blade Force 16GBAllview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB
ZTE Blade Force 16GBAllview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB

How are the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" different? We have tested and evaluated their differences. We also explain which one may be best for you.

ZTE Blade Force 16GBAllview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB
ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB

General rating:
Griprating-image2.6
78.0mm x 156.0mm x 9.1mm
rating-image3.0
72.4mm x 148.7mm x 9.1mm
Screen qualityrating-image3.1
IPS LCD, 5.5inch, 720 x 1280
rating-image3.0
IPS LCD, 5.2inch, 720 x 1280
Performancerating-image2.4
Qualcomm MSM8920 Snapdragon 427, 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores), 2.0GB
rating-image3.7
Mediatek MT6753, 1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores), 3.0GB
Storage sizerating-image3.5
16.0GB
rating-image3.9
32.0GB
Batteryrating-image4.5
3000.0mAh
rating-image5.0
4000.0mAh
Rear-camera resolutionrating-image2.5
8.0MP
rating-image3.6
13.0MP
Front-camera resolutionrating-image3.3
5.0MP
rating-image4.0
8.0MP

What is the difference between the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB"? See a detailed comparison of ease of use and performance

Comparison of weight and size of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB"

The design of ZTE Blade Force 16GB

The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" is 156.0mm long, 78.0mm wide, and 9.1mm thick. It weighs 170.1g.

The design of Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB

The "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" is 148.7mm long, 72.4mm wide, and 9.1mm thick. It weighs 161.0g.

Which is the better design to use?

Those who are looking for a phone they can use one-handedly will find the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" easier to use and carry around. "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" is bigger than "ZTE Blade Force 16GB", which makes it easier to type on it via flick input. Also, "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" is more compact than "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and less bulky for the user to carry around.

The difference in weight is 9g. "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" weighs less than "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and is easier to handle.

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB

Ease of holding it in one hand56/10067/100
How much it does not feel heavy to hold in one hand39/10045/100
Ease of carrying around55/10061/100

Compare the display of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB"

Display of the ZTE Blade Force 16GB

The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 267ppi. The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has a 5.5inch screen size.

Display of the Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB

The "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" uses a IPS LCD liquid crystal. The resolution is 720 x 1280, and the pixel density is 282ppi. The "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" has a 5.2inch screen size.

Which has a better screen?

This makes a 0.2inch difference in the display sizes. When actually viewing the two phones' onscreen displays, it is obvious that they are roughly the same size. For doing internet research using systems such as SNS, there is not much difference between the two phones. Both the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose. The gaming screens of these two phones are roughly the same size. Both the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

There is very little difference in the clarity of the displays of "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" when used for research, gaming, or other similar purposes. When using the smartphone as a VR, the screen is generally held much closer to the face than when using the smartphone for other purposes, and so the clarity of the screen becomes a rather important factor. When you compare how easy it is to see the VR on the two phones, it is pretty much the same. Neither the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" nor the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" have the necessary specs for this kind of purpose, so the experience will be unsatisfactory.

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB

How suited is the screen for usual usage?72/10070/100
How suited is the screen to play games on?73/10070/100

Compare the camera performances of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB"

Camera performance of ZTE Blade Force 16GB

The main camera of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has 8.0MP. The front camera has 5.0MP.

Camera performance of Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB

The main camera of the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" has 13.0MP. The front camera has 8.0MP.

Which camera performance is better?

The back cameras thus have a 5MP difference in comparison. The "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" also functions better for long-shot photos for the perfect group photo or a picturesque shot of a beautiful location. The "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB"'s rear camera triumphs as well, boasting a better megapixel count for close-up Instagram-worthy pictures of meals and desserts. The "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

There is a 3MP difference in front camera pixel number. The "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB"'s front camera also works terrifically well with selfie sticks and for capturing distant objects like the background scenery in your selfies. The "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB"'s front camera has a more suitable megapixel count for shooting objects up close for selfies and such.

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB

Is is suited to taking far away objects with the rear camera?50/10072/100
Is it suited for taking close objects with the built-in camera?65/10080/100

Comparison of the processing capabilities of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB"

The processing capability of the ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" uses the Qualcomm MSM8920 Snapdragon 427 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores). The memory capacity is 2.0GB.

The processing capability of the Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB

Performance is defined by the chipset, and the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" uses the Mediatek MT6753 SoC. The CPU performance is 1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores). The memory capacity is 3.0GB.

Which has the better processing capability?

As compared to the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB", the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" boasts boasts a better CPU and specs. This is a 1GB difference in memory capacity. The "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" has more memory storage, making the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" work better for multitasking or running 3D games.

For those who only use their phone's basic features like emailing, instant messaging, or social media, the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" is the better choice to buy over the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB". Users looking for a phone to meet their web browsing and video playing needs, with the occasional game every now and then, should definitely go for the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB". The "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" has the necessary specs for this kind of purpose.

The "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" runs 2D games and simple 3D games much more smoothly, making it the better choice in this area. Complex, full-fledged 3D games definitely run better on the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" than the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB".

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB

Review on the CPU capbility and memory capacity when using Social Networks or the Internet71/10082/100
Review on the CPU speed and the memory capacity while playing 3D games33/10066/100

Comparison of the battery life of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB"

Battery performance of ZTE Blade Force 16GB

The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has a battery capacity of 3000.0mAh.

Battery performance of Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB

The "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" has a battery capacity of 4000.0mAh.

Which battery perfomances is better?

This makes a difference in battery capacity of 1000mAh, but it is not enough to only compare the capacity. With a high-performance CPU, the battery drains faster, and a larger screen also uses more battery.

The "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" is also a great choice for those who only use their phone for occasional phone calls or for checking the time. For people who tend to use their phone for looking up things on the internet, checking up on social media, or playing the occasional game, I recommend the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" over the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB". Both the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

The battery life of the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" is well equipped to handle long hours of gaming, video playback, and other kinds of frequent daily use. Both the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB

Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using Social Networks and the Internet90/100100/100
Review on the battery life of a phone mainly using mainly games and videos79/100100/100

Compare the storage capacity of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB"

The storage capacity of the ZTE Blade Force 16GB

The "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" has 16.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.

The storage capacity of the Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB

The "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" has 32.0GB of internal memory. It is also compatible with SD cards, so when there is insufficient storage space, then a SD card can be used to add more storage. A SD with a maximum of 128.0GB can be used.

Which has the easier storage to use?

The difference in internal memory is about 16GB. "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" is recommended if you are using your phone mainly for downloading games and using apps such as social media. Avid gamers should look to the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" for fulfilling their storage needs, as the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" unfortunately falls behind here.

When the storage added with a SD card is included, then the difference is about 16GB. Because the speed of loading from or saving to the SD card is slow, it is suited for saving pictures or videos. If you want to save long videos or save lots of photos, it does not make much difference whether you choose "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" or "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB". Both the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" can be easily used for this kind of purpose.

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB

Review on the storage capacity when playing many games70/10078/100
Review on when you store many pictures and videos76/10078/100

Which to buy, the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" or "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB"

At the end of the day which is better, the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" or "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB"?

"Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" is easier for the user to hold and is more compact, and so it is recommended. If choosing based on screen size, there is hardly any difference between "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB". The "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" also hands down has the superior specs. Between the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" and the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB", the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" is overall the clear winner.

ZTE Blade Force 16GB

Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB

Handling51/10059/100
Display61/10060/100
CPU specs48/10073/100
General rating60/10072/100

Is it recommended to buy the ZTE Blade Force 16GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. Its processing performance is roughly the same as an average smartphone. It is a well balanced model, but its performance does feel slightly lacking. Buying a higher performance smartphone would make using apps easier. Looking at the overall specifications, the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

Is it recommended to buy the Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB, compared with other smartphones?

Compared to other smartphones, the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" is averagely easy to hold. Although it can be a little difficult, it is the right size to be able to operate with one hand. The screen size is comparable to that of standard smartphones, so it is suited for doing internet searches and browsing or for simple SNS messaging. In addition, its processing capabilities are of a slightly higher specification compared to the average smart phone, and can be said to be more than adequate for normal use. However, its performance may feel slightly inadequate when playing 3D games and such. Looking at the overall specifications, the "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" is a middle-range to high-end smart phone.

What are the spec differences between the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB" ?

A summary of the technical specifications of the "ZTE Blade Force 16GB" and "Allview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB". Functions and performance variations on the same model will be highlighted in red.

ZTE Blade Force 16GBAllview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB
ZTE Blade Force 16GBAllview P9 Energy Lite (2017) 32GB
ColorBlueBlack/Gold
OSAndroidAndroid
Dimensions (width x height x thickness)78.0mm x 156.0mm x 9.1mm72.4mm x 148.7mm x 9.1mm
Weight170.1g161.0g
Display size5.5inch5.2inch
Display typeIPS LCDIPS LCD
Screen resolution (width x height)720 x 1280720 x 1280
Pixel density267ppi282ppi
Battery capacity3000.0mAh4000.0mAh
ChipsetQualcomm MSM8920 Snapdragon 427Mediatek MT6753
CPU specs1.4GHz×4(4.0-cores)1.3GHz×8(8.0-cores)
RAM size2.0GB3.0GB
Storage size16.0GB32.0GB
Rear-camera resolution8.0MP13.0MP
Front-camera resolution5.0MP8.0MP

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Look at a smartphone

Compare smartphones

Check price

New articles